Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2023-02-10
Type Nega Negligence Auto
Docket 58 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Rodriguez Angel Sr
Defendant Callihan, Hope D 6707 Winterset Gardens Road Winter Haven Fl 33884
Photo of Hon. James a Yancey

Judge

Hon. James a Yancey

Polk County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. IVIL COVER SHEET
  2. OMPLAINT
  3. UMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK/ HOPE D. CALLIHAN
  4. UMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK/ MERCURY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA
  5. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT HOPE D CALLIHAN
  6. LAINTIFFS REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO DEFENDANT HOPE D CALLIHAN
  7. LAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT HOPE D CALLIHAN
  8. LAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT MERCURY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA
  9. LAINTIFFS REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO DEFENDANT MERCURY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA
  10. LAINTIFFS NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT MERCURY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA
  11. ERVICE OF PROCESS SERVED - MERCURY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA CO THE FLORIDA CHIEF FINANCIAL
  12. FFICER
  13. EFENDANTS ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT
  14. EFENDANTS NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 2.516(B)(1) AND DESIGNATION OF EMAIL
  15. DDRESSES
  16. EFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  17. EFENDANTS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF
  18. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF
  19. EFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  20. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF
  21. EFENDANTS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF
  22. EFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  23. EQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF
  24. EFENDANTS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF
  25. ESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  26. ERVICE OF PROCESS SERVED - HOPE D CALLIHAN
  27. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON PARTY REGARDING PLAINTIFF ANGEL RODRIGUEZ SR
  28. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON PARTY REGARDING PLAINTIFF FELIX RODRIGUEZ NIEVES
  29. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON PARTY REGARDING PLAINTIFF LUZ RODRIGUEZ
  30. RDER ESTABLISHING CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN - GENERAL
  31. ERTFICATE OF NON-OBJECTION REGARDING PLAINTIFF ANGEL RODRIGUEZ SR
  32. ERTFICATE OF NON-OBJECTION REGARDING PLAINTIFF FELIX RODRIGUEZ NIEVES
  33. ERTFICATE OF NON-OBJECTION REGARDING PLAINTIFF LUZ ROGRIGUEZ
  34. EFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING SOCIAL MEDIA INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  35. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC MEDIA TO PLAINTIFF
  36. D REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF
  37. EFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING SOCIAL MEDIA INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  38. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC MEDIA TO PLAINTIFF
  39. D REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF
  40. EFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING SOCIAL MEDIA INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  41. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONIC MEDIA TO PLAINTIFF
  42. D REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF
  43. OTICE OF APPEARANCE
  44. ESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESSES
  45. NSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  46. EFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  47. EFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  48. EFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  49. IRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF
  50. IRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF
  51. IRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF
  52. EFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT HOPE D CALLHAN
  53. EQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT HOPE D CALLHAN
  54. LAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT MERCURY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF
  55. MERICAS DISCOVERY
  56. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON PARTY REGARDING PLAINTIFF LUZ RICRIGUEZ
  57. OTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON PARTY REGARDING PLAINITFF ANGEL RODRIGUEZ SR
  58. EFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.