Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-04-18
Status INACTIVE
Type Tort Miscellaneous
Docket 33 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Carlos Harrington
Defendant Rudy Evosirch
Photo of Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Judge

Hon. KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. UDGMENT ENTRY(54468026) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: JOSEPH G RITZLER [email protected]
  3. UDGMENT ENTRY(54468025) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: NICOLE C LONGINO [email protected]
  4. ASE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. O.S.J. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  5. TIPULATION FILED BY D1 RUDY EVOSIRCH ATTORNEY JOSEPH G RITZLER 0051934 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND JUDGMENT ENTRY
  6. OURT NOTES THAT PARTIES HAVE REACHED AN AGREEMENT. THEREFORE, THE CASE IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COURT COSTS ASSESSED TO THE DEFENDANT. FINAL. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. OTICE OF DEPOSITION OF D1 RUDY EVOSIRCH FILED NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF
  8. EDIATION SET FOR 05/16/2024 AT 10:30 AM. (Notice Sent).
  9. ASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HELD 3/12/2024. THE FOLLOWING DATES, IN ADDITION TO THOSE AS SET FORTH IN THE TRIAL ORDER, APPLY: 1. PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE EXPERT REPORTS BY NOT LATER THAN 8/16/2024. 2. DEFENDANTS TO PROVIDE EXPERT REPORTS BY NOT LATER THAN 10/18/2024. 3. ALL DISCOVERY IS TO BE COMPLETED BY NOT LATER THAN 10/18/2024. 4. TRIAL IS SCHEDULED FOR 12/2/2024 AT 8:00 A.M. 5. TRIAL ORDER ENTERED. O.S.J. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. APTIONED CASE IS HEREBY REFERRED TO MEDIATION WITH THE COURT MEDIATOR. MEDIATION TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THIS ENTRY. NOTICE ISSUED
  11. RIAL SET FOR 12/02/2024 AT 08:00 AM.
  12. N ORDER TO EFFECTUATE SETTLEMENT, THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HELD 1/9/2024 IS CONTINUED TO 3/12/2024 AT 9:00 A.M. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. ASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR 1/9/2024 AT 9:00 A.M. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES, IN WRITING, OF THIS DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT IN PERSON AND TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE BE PRESENT IN PERSON. FAILURE OF ANY KIND OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO APPEAR AT THIS PROPERLY SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. IF A CONTINUANCE IS SOUGHT FOR ANY REASON, PLEASE FILE THE APPROPRIATE MOTION AT LEAST SEVEN DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED EVENT. DO NOT CALL THE COURT. DATES CANNOT BE CONSIDERED FOR CONTINUANCE UNLESS A MOTION HAS BEEN DOCKETED AND HAND-DELIVERED TO THE COURT. NOTICE ISSUED
  14. OTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FILED SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
  15. OTION FILED FOR D1 RUDY EVOSIRCH JOSEPH G RITZLER 0051934 MOTION TO COMPEL 01/09/2024 - MOOT
  16. OTICE OF DEPOSITION OF D1 RUDY EVOSIRCH FILED NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF
  17. 1 CARLOS HARRINGTON'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE TYRONE E REED 0030839. ^F^ MOTION FOR CONTINUANACE 01/09/2024 - MOOT
  18. HE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE HELD 7/27/2023 IS CONTINUED TO 8/24/2023 AT 9:30 A.M. FAILURE OF PLAINTIFF TO TIMELY INITIATE THE CALL WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. NOTICE ISSUED
  19. OTICE OF DEPOSITION OF D1 RUDY EVOSIRCH FILED NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF
  20. TELEPHONIC CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IS SET FOR 7/27/2023 AT 11:00 A.M. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL ARRANGE THE CONFERENCE AND CALL 440-503-0385 AT THE SCHEDULED TIME. FAILURE OF ANY KIND BY THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO TIMELY APPEAR BY PHONE AT THIS PROPERLY SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. THIS REQUIREMENT INCLUDES THE DEFENDANT EVEN IF PLAINTIFF FAILS IN ITS OBLIGATION UNDER THIS ORDER. IF A CONTINUANCE IS SOUGHT FOR ANY REASON, PLEASE FILE THE APPROPRIATE MOTION AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED EVENT. DO NOT CALL THE COURT. NOTICE ISSUED
  21. NSWER FILED BY D1 RUDY EVOSIRCH ATTORNEY JOSEPH G RITZLER 0051934 ANSWER OF DEFENDANT
  22. SPS RECEIPT NO. 50409196 DELIVERED BY USPS 04/26/2023 EVOSIRCH/RUDY/ PROCESSED BY COC 05/03/2023.
  23. UMS COMPLAINT(50409196) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: RUDY EVOSIRCH 1810 W. 25TH STREET CLEVELAND, OH 44113
  24. RIT FEE
  25. UMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  26. UDGE KATHLEEN ANN SUTULA ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  27. EGAL RESEARCH
  28. EGAL NEWS
  29. EGAL AID
  30. OURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  31. OMPUTER FEE
  32. LERK'S FEE
  33. EPOSIT AMOUNT PAID TYRONE E REED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more