Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana Unified County

Court

Indiana Unified County

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-12-13
Status Decided
Type F 6 Felony 6
Docket 73 entries
Disposition Judgment

Parties

Plaintiff State Of Indiana
Defendant Clark, Ginger Dawn
Photo of Hon. Kenworthy, Dana J.

Judge

Hon. Kenworthy, Dana J.

Grant County (IN)

Indiana

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case Opened as a New Filing
  2. Case Filed Electronically
  3. Appearance Filed
  4. Notice of Exclusion of Confidential Information
  5. Information Filed
  6. Probable Cause Affidavit Filed
  7. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  8. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  9. Warrant or Writ of Attmnt for the Body of a Person Issued
  10. Warrant or Writ of Attmnt for the Body of a Person Issued
  11. Warrant or Writ of Attmnt for the Body of a Person Served
  12. Cash Bond Entered in Clerk's Office
  13. Bond Form Filed
  14. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  15. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  16. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  17. Initial Hearing
  18. Order on Initial Hearing
  19. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  20. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  21. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  22. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  23. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  24. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  25. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  26. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  27. Hearing Journal Entry
  28. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  29. Automated Paper Notice Issued to Parties
  30. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  31. Appearance Filed
  32. Motion Filed
  33. Document Filed
  34. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  35. Status of Counsel Hearing
  36. Motion for Continuance Filed
  37. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  38. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  39. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  40. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  41. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  42. Order Granting Motion for Continuance
  43. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  44. Motion for Continuance Filed
  45. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  46. Order Granting Motion for Continuance
  47. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  48. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  49. Pretrial Conference
  50. Hearing Journal Entry
  51. Order on Pretrial Conference
  52. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  53. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  54. Final PreTrial Hearing/Conference
  55. Hearing Journal Entry
  56. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  57. Hearing Scheduling Activity
  58. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  59. Jury Trial
  60. Change of Plea Hearing
  61. Hearing Journal Entry
  62. Plea Agreement Filed
  63. Judgment
  64. Sentenced
  65. Order of Confinement (Sentenced)
  66. Abstract of Judgment Completed for non-DOC case
  67. Conditions of Probation
  68. Motion Filed
  69. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties
  70. Order Granting Motion to Withdraw Appearance
  72. Motion Filed Motion to Withdraw Filed By: Clark, Ginger Dawn File Stamp: 12/06/2022
  73. Automated ENotice Issued to Parties Motion Filed ---- 12/7/2022 : Nathan David Meeks;Grant County Probation;Rodney Lee Faulk;Scott J. Hunt

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix and motion outcomes. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more