Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-04-03
Status Open
Type Torts|Other Tortious Action
Docket 33 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Myrick, Kyl V
Defendant Harvard University

Docket Entries

  1. Attorney appearance On this date Pro Se added for Plaintiff Kyl V Myrick
  2. Case assigned to: DCM Track F - Fast Track was added on 04/03/2023
  3. Affidavit of Indigency and request for waiver substitution of state payment of fees and costs filed without Supplemental affidavit ALLOWED Filing + Service fees only
  4. Original civil complaint filed.
  5. Civil action cover sheet filed.
  6. Service Returned for Defendant Harvard University: Service through person in charge / agent;
  7. Plaintiff Kyl V Myrick's Motion to Stay Pending Supreme Judicial Court Matter
  8. Defendant Harvard University's Notice of It's Motion To Dismiss Rule 9E
  9. Attorney appearance On this date Andrea Evans Zoia, Esq. added for Defendant Harvard University
  10. General correspondence regarding Letter On Preclusion Of Rule 9A Package RE Defensive Dismissal
  11. Exhibits/Appendix
  12. General correspondence regarding Advisement of SJC proceedings on it's case activation evidence Applies To: Myrick, Kyl V (Plaintiff)
  13. Endorsement on Submission of General correspondence regarding Letter On Preclusion Of Rule 9A Package RE Defensive Dismissal (#7.0): No Action Taken (dated 5/17/23) notice sent 5/18/23
  14. Plaintiff Kyl V Myrick's EMERGENCY Motion for extension Until June 27, 2023
  15. Endorsement on Motion for extension Until June 27, 2023 (#9.0): ALLOWED without opposition. (Dated 5/25/2023) Notice sent 5/26/2023
  16. Plaintiff Kyl V Myrick's EMERGENCY Request to Extend Until July 19, 2023
  17. Plaintiff Kyl V Myrick's Motion in unresolved Stay Request Superseding the Extension
  18. Defendant Harvard University's Motion for Injunction
  19. Harvard University's Memorandum in support of Motion For Injunction
  20. Affidavit Of Compliance With Superior Court Rule 9A
  21. Certificate Of Compliance With Superior Court Rule 9C
  22. Rule 9A Notice Of Filing
  23. List Of Documents
  24. Defendant Harvard University's Motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint
  25. Harvard University's Memorandum in support of Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint
  26. Affidavit Of Compliance with Superior Court Rule 9A
  27. Affidavit Of Compliance with Superior Court Rule 9C
  28. Notice Of Filing
  29. List Of Documents
  30. Endorsement on Motion of unresolved Stay Request Superseding the Extension (#11.0): ALLOWED (Dated: 8/1/23) Notice Sent 08/03/23
  31. Plaintiff Kyl V Myrick's EMERGENCY Assented to Request to Extend
  32. Plaintiff Kyl V Myrick's Motion to Strike Aug 1st Papers Violating July 13th Request
  33. Endorsement on Motion to Stay Pending Supreme Judicial Court Matter (#5.0): DENIED Denied w/ out prejudice for failure to comply with R 9A. Plaintiff may re-file in accordance w/ same. (Dated: 8/21/23) Notice sent 8/23/23

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more