Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Dallas County Civil

Court

Dallas County Civil

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-24
Status CLOSED
Type Cntr Cnsmr Com Debt
Docket 33 entries
Disposition AGREED JUDGMENT

Parties

Plaintiff Kirby Smith Machinery Inc
Defendant Texas Utility Services Llc | Carrizales, Gabriel
Photo of Hon. Williams Kristina M

Judge

Hon. Williams Kristina M

Dallas County (TX)

Texas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. 03/24/2022 NEW CASE FILED (OCA) - CIVIL
  2. 03/24/2022 ORIGINAL PETITION View Document ORIGINAL PETITION
  3. 03/24/2022 ISSUE CITATION View Document ISSUE CITATION - TEXAS UTLIITY SERVICES LLC View Document ISSUE CITATION - ROSE CARRIZALES View Document ISSUE CITATION - GABRIEL CARRIZALES
  4. 04/04/2022 CITATION Served 05/13/2022 Anticipated Server ESERVE Anticipated Method Actual Server OUT OF COUNTY Returned 05/19/2022 Comment TEXAS UTILITY SERVICES LLC
  5. 04/04/2022 CITATION Unserved Anticipated Server ESERVE Anticipated Method Comment ROSE CARRIZALES
  6. 04/04/2022 CITATION Unserved Anticipated Server ESERVE Anticipated Method Comment GABRIEL CARRIZALES
  7. 04/26/2022 ORIGINAL ANSWER - GENERAL DENIAL View Document ORIGINAL ANSWER - GENERAL DENIAL/ROSE CARRIZALES
  8. 04/27/2022 ORIGINAL ANSWER - GENERAL DENIAL View Document ORIGINAL ANSWER - GENERAL DENIAL
  9. 04/27/2022 SCHEDULING ORDER View Document SCHEDULING ORDER Comment - UNIFORM / LEVEL 1
  10. 05/19/2022 RETURN OF SERVICE View Document AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE - EXECUTED CITATION - TEXAS UTILITY SERVICES LLC Comment AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE - EXECUTED CITATION - TEXAS UTILITY SERVICES LLC
  11. 06/02/2022 RETURNED MAIL View Document RETURNED MAIL NOTICE NON JURY TRIAL ORDER SIGNED 4/26/22 ONLINE-MARK BAGNALL Comment NOTICE NON JURY TRIAL/ORDER SIGNED 4/26/22 ONLINE-MARK BAGNALL **Emailed to counsel on 6/3/22**
  12. 06/24/2022 NOTICE OF NONSUIT View Document NOTICE NONSUIT
  13. 06/24/2022 NON-SIGNED PROPOSED ORDER/JUDGMENT View Document PROPOSED ORDER NONSUIT/ROSE CARRIZELS Comment PROPOSED NONSUIT/ROSE CARRIZALES
  14. 06/28/2022 ORDER - NONSUIT View Document ORDER NONSUIT/ROSE CARRIZELS Comment ROSE CARRIZALES
  15. 06/28/2022 NOTE - CLERKS View Document MAILED ORDER OF NONSUIT AS TO ROSE CARRIZALES View Document MAILED ORDER OF NONSUIT AS TO ROSE CARRIZALES Comment MAILED ORDER OF NONSUIT TO ROSE CARRIZALES
  16. 06/30/2022 NON-SIGNED PROPOSED ORDER/JUDGMENT View Document PROPOSED ORDER - AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT Comment PROPOSED AGREED FINAL JUDGMENT
  17. 07/06/2022 NOTICE OF JUDGMENT MAILED View Document FP NOTICE OF AGREED JUDGMENT RULE 306(a)(3) View Document FP NOTICE OF AGREED JUDGMENT RULE 306(a)(3) View Document FP NOTICE OF AGREED JUDGMENT RULE 306(a)(3) Comment (3) - ALL PARTIES
  18. 08/25/2022 RELEASE OF JUDGMENT View Document RELEASE JUDGMENT/AGREED JUDGMENTS 07/05/2022 Comment AGREED JUDGMENTS 07/05/2022

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more