Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2021-11-17
Status Completed/Re-Completed
Type Adl Criminal Adult
Docket 197 entries

Parties

Plaintiff (criminal) of Washington
Defendant (wip) webb, Brian Scott
Photo of Hon. Warning Stephen M

Judge

Hon. Warning Stephen M

Cowlitz County (WA)

Washington

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. 11/17/2021
  2. 11/18/2021
  3. 12/01/2021
  4. 01/11/2022
  5. 01/27/2022
  6. 01/31/2022
  7. 06/17/2022
  8. 08/11/2022
  9. 09/21/2022
  10. 09/21/2022
  11. Motion Hearing
  12. Judicial Officer Scudder, Thad
  13. Comment Court denies motion to dismiss at this time
  14. Memorandum of Authorities
  15. Comment in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Admit to DSHS for Competency Restoration
  16. Capacity/Competency
  17. Original Type Capacity/Competency
  18. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  19. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  20. Result Held
  21. Status Conference / Hearing
  22. Motion
  23. Comment to Amend Information
  24. Amended Information
  25. Motion Hearing
  26. Original Type Motion Hearing
  27. Judicial Officer Scudder, Thad
  28. Hearing Time 1:30 PM
  29. Result Held
  30. Comment to Dismiss
  31. Motion Hearing
  32. Judicial Officer Scudder, Thad
  33. Comment Ct denies mtn to dismiss
  34. Response
  35. Comment to Deft's Motion to Dismiss
  36. Capacity/Competency
  37. Original Type Capacity/Competency
  38. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  39. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  40. Result Held
  41. Status Conference / Hearing
  42. Comment Waiting on restoration bed date
  43. Capacity/Competency
  44. Original Type Capacity/Competency
  45. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  46. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  47. Result Held
  48. Comment - has deft been transported to western state?
  49. Status Conference / Hearing
  50. Comment Deft is at WSH
  51. Report
  52. Comment re Competency Evaluation from OFMHS (Filed Electronically)
  53. Capacity/Competency
  54. Original Type Capacity/Competency
  55. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  56. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  57. Result Held
  58. Comment REVIEW RESTORATION
  59. Motion Hearing
  60. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  61. Comment Ct signs order for additional restoration
  62. Competency Restoration Order
  63. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  64. Capacity/Competency
  65. Original Type Capacity/Competency
  66. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  67. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  68. Result Held
  69. Motion Hearing
  70. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  71. Comment EVALUATION SCHEDULED FOR 7/5/2022
  72. Notice of Substitution of Counsel
  73. Report
  74. Comment re Competency Evaluation from OFMHS (Filed Electronically)
  75. Capacity/Competency
  76. Original Type Capacity/Competency
  77. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  78. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  79. Result Continued
  80. Hearing Continued Defense Respondent Requested
  81. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  82. Motion Hearing
  83. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  84. Capacity/Competency
  85. Original Type Capacity/Competency
  86. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  87. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  88. Result Held
  89. Comment - Review Competency Eval Report
  90. Motion Hearing
  91. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  92. Comment Ct signs order determining competency to stand trial
  93. Order Determining Competency to Stand Trial
  94. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  95. Arraignment on Amended Information
  96. Original Type Arraignment on Amended Information
  97. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  98. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  99. Result Held
  100. Comment & Set trial dates
  101. Not Guilty Plea Hearing
  102. Comment Ct denies bail reduction
  103. Order Setting Case Schedule
  104. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  105. Omnibus Application of Prosecuting Attorney
  106. Pretrial/Omnibus
  107. Judicial Officer Nelson, David A
  108. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  109. Cancel Reason Stricken-Not Confirmed
  110. Readiness Hearing
  111. Original Type Readiness Hearing
  112. Judicial Officer Scudder, Thad
  113. Hearing Time 9:00 AM
  114. Result Held
  115. Trial Cancelled Defense Respondent Requested
  116. Judicial Officer Scudder, Thad
  117. Motion Hearing
  118. Judicial Officer Scudder, Thad
  119. Comment Ct sets plea date
  120. Jury Trial-12
  121. Hearing Time 8:45 AM
  122. Cancel Reason Defense/Respondent Requested
  123. Guilty Plea and Sentencing
  124. Original Type Guilty Plea and Sentencing
  125. Judicial Officer Warning, Stephen M
  126. Hearing Time 1:30 PM
  127. Result Held
  128. Guilty Plea and Sentencing Hearing
  129. Comment J&S signed; NCO signed
  130. Amended Information
  131. Statement of Defendant on Plea of Guilty
  132. Judicial Officer Warning, Stephen M
  133. Report
  134. Comment General Scoring Form
  135. Felony Judgment and Sentence
  136. Judicial Officer Warning, Stephen M
  137. Order for Protection From Civil Harassment
  138. Judicial Officer Warning, Stephen M

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.