Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-01-24
Status ACTIVE - ACTIVE
Type Ca Civil Appeal Circuit
Docket 49 entries

Parties

Plaintiff House, David B|Watson, Brett David|Dobson, Rebecca Margaret Byrd
Defendant Taylor, Andrew Mikeal|Harper, Robert Victor|House, Karmen N|Harper, Alexandra Kendall
Photo of Hon. Guthrie David Fredric

Judge

Hon. Guthrie David Fredric

Arkansas County (AR)

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. APPELLATE COVERSHEET
  2. Appellate Court coversheet
  3. No Images
  5. E-filed record. Pleadings: 1 volume; 148 pages. Transcript: 1 volume; 26 pages. No physical exhibits. Conventional appeal record in CV-20-533 related to this appeal.
  6. No Images
  7. LOWER COURT INFORMATION
  9. No Images
  10. BRIEFING COMMENCED
  11. Appellant's brief due March 5, 2023.
  13. PAYMENT RECEIVED
  14. A Payment of $165.00 was made on receipt ARCA4827.
  15. No Images
  18. MOTION
  19. RECUSAL
  20. none.
  22. RECUSAL
  23. none.
  24. No Images
  27. No Images
  28. RESPONSE TO MOTION
  29. Response to motion to consolidate records.
  31. LETTER ORDERS - COA
  32. Appellant's motion to consolidate records is moot. Harrison, C.J., and Abramson, J., not participating. See docket entry dated January 24, 2023, relating the two appeals.
  33. ORDER
  35. Appellant's motion for extension of time to file brief.
  36. MOTION
  37. BRIEF EXTENSION
  39. ORDER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more