Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-12-29
Type Cont Contract & Indebtedness
Docket 17 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Craig David C/o Michael Ciocchetti 125 N Ridgewood Ave., Suite 100 Daytona Beach Fl 32114
Defendant Kin Interinsurance Network C/o Chief Financial Officer 200 E Gaines Street Tallahassee Fl 32314
Photo of Hon. James a Yancey

Judge

Hon. James a Yancey

Polk County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. IVIL COVER SHEET
  2. OMPLAINT
  3. UMMONS (TO BE ISSUED BY CLERK)
  4. OTICE OF SERVING FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT
  5. IRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO DEFENDANT
  6. IRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT
  7. UMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK - KIN INTERINSURANCE NETWORK
  8. OTICE OF APPEARNACE AND DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES
  9. EFENDANTS MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT AND DISCOVERY
  10. EQUESTS
  11. EFENDANT KIN INTERINSURANCE NETWORKDS ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES WITH DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
  12. EPLY TO AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  13. GREED ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND
  14. ISCOVERY REQUESTS
  15. EFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  16. EFENDANTS NOTICE OF SERVICE OF UNVERIFIED ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
  17. EFENDANTS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.