Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-09-30
Status Judgment
Type 47 Small Claims $5,001 $10,000
Docket 56 entries
Disposition satisfaction of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Harless, Randy Jake|Morrison, Dace Morrisone|View Document 9/30/2022 's Claim Hrg 11/17/22|View Document 10/14/2022 's Claim Mailed Certified Mail
Defendant Rodriquez Cruz, Antonio
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer negin, Stephanie

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer negin, Stephanie

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the ( Order Request for Issuance of Clerk's Certificate of Satisfaction of Judgment) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on ( ) . Parties served: ( All Parties )
  2. View Document Plaintiff's Claim HRG 11/17/22
  3. Cause Of Action
  4. Action Plaintiff's Claim
  5. File Date
  6. Letter Received
  7. View Document -Letter Received
  8. Comment Re: Certified mail
  9. Plaintiff's claim mailed certified mail
  10. View Document - Plaintiff's claim mailed certified mail
  11. Comment Tracking number:7019 0700 0002 2114 7355
  12. Proof of Service
  13. View Document 10-17-22 Proof of Service
  14. Plaintiff's Claim and Order SC
  15. Unserved
  16. Comment Fee$15.00 Unserved-Defective- Singnatures do no match name on #1.
  17. Proof of Service
  18. View Document Proof of Service
  19. Plaintiff's Claim and Order SC
  20. Served
  21. Comment Fee: $0.00
  22. Court Trial
  23. Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark
  24. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  25. Result Heard
  26. Minute Order Attachment
  27. View Document 11.17.22 Minute Order
  28. Appeared in Person
  29. Taken under advisement
  30. Chambers Work- Pre
  31. Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark
  32. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  33. Result Heard
  34. Minute Order Attachment
  35. View Document 11.18.22 Minute Order
  36. Comment From Chambers
  37. Notice of Entry of Judgment Mailed to All Parties
  38. Letter Received
  39. View Document -Letter Received
  40. Comment Re: Satisfaction of Judgment
  41. Letter of Documents Returned Without Filing
  42. View Document -Letter of Documents Returned Without Filing
  43. Comment Re: Satisfaction of Judgment
  44. Chambers Work - Post
  45. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  46. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  47. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  48. Order Received for Signature
  49. Comment Forwarded to Dept: 402 Order for: Request for Issuance of Clerk's Certificate of Satisfaction of Judgment
  50. Order Granted
  51. View Document Order Granted
  52. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  53. Comment On Request for Issuance of Clerk's Certificate of Satisfaction of Judgment
  54. Satisfaction of Judgment in Full filed
  55. View Document 12-30-22 Satisfaction of Judgment in Full filed
  56. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix and motion outcomes. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more