Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-19
Status Judgment
Type 47 Small Claims $1,501 $5,000
Docket 87 entries
Disposition satisfaction of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Sauceda, Ralph|Sauceda, Christie|View Document 's Claim Filed|View Document 8/25/22 's Claim Mailed Certified Mail|View Document 8/25/22 's Claim Mailed Certified Mail|View Document 's Claim Filed|View Document 8/25/22 's Claim Mailed Certified Mail|View Document 8/25/22 's Claim Mailed Certified Mail
Defendant Mora, Juan E.|Mora, Karilyn
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer negin, Stephanie

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer negin, Stephanie

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. View Document Satisfaction of Judgment in Full filed
  2. View Document Plaintiff's Claim filed
  3. Plaintiff's claim mailed certified mail
  4. View Document Plaintiff's claim mailed certified mail
  5. Comment Tracking number: 7021 1970 0001 0313 8586
  6. Plaintiff's claim mailed certified mail
  7. View Document Plaintiff's claim mailed certified mail
  8. Comment Tracking number: 7021 1970 0001 0313 8579
  9. Cause Of Action
  10. Action Plaintiff's Claim
  11. File Date
  12. Proof of Service
  13. View Document -Proof of Service
  14. Proof of Service
  15. View Document 8-25-22 Proof of Service
  16. Plaintiff's Claim and Order SC
  17. Unserved
  18. Comment Fee: $15.00-Unserved Defective-Wrong signature
  19. Plaintiff's Claim and Order SC
  20. Unserved
  21. Comment Fee: $15.00-Unserved Defective-Wrong signature
  22. Letter Received
  23. View Document Letter Received
  24. Comment Re: Notice of Lis Pendens
  25. Request Filed
  26. View Document Request Filed
  27. Comment Re: Request for Notice of Lis Pendens
  28. Chambers Work- Pre
  29. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  30. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  31. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  32. Order Received for Signature
  33. View Document Order Received for Signature
  34. Comment Forwarded to Dept: 402 Order for: Notice of Lis Pendens
  35. Proof of Service
  36. View Document Proof of Service
  37. Proof of Service
  38. View Document Proof of Service
  39. Plaintiff's Claim and Order SC
  40. Served
  41. Comment Fee $ 40.00
  42. Plaintiff's Claim and Order SC
  43. Served
  44. Comment Fee$40.00
  45. Chambers Work- Pre
  46. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  47. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  48. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  49. Order Denied
  50. View Document Order Denied
  51. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  52. Comment Notice of Lis Pendens
  53. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  54. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Order was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on . Parties served: Ralph Sauceda and Christie Sauceda
  55. Letter Received
  56. View Document Letter Received
  57. Comment Re: Lis Pendens for property
  58. Notice of Hearing
  59. View Document Notice of Hearing 10/13/22
  60. Comment Hearing moved from D-97D to D-402
  61. Notice of Exhibits Submitted to Court Prior to Trial
  62. Comment Hearing Date: Time: 8:45AM Department: 402
  63. Court Trial
  64. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  65. Hearing Time 8:45 AM
  66. Result Heard
  67. Minute Order Attachment
  68. View Document Minute Order Attachment
  69. Appeared in Person
  70. Taken Under Submission or Advisement
  71. Court Trial
  72. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  73. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  74. Result Heard
  75. Minute Order Attachment
  76. View Document Minute Order Attachment
  77. Statement of Decision
  78. View Document Statement of Decision
  79. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  80. Notice of Entry of Judgment Mailed to All Parties
  81. Request Filed
  82. View Document 12-1-22 Request Filed
  83. Comment Request to Pay Judgment to Court
  84. Deposit, payment,disbursment
  85. View Document 12-1-22 Deposit, payment,disbursment
  86. Comment Money deposited into trust account in the amount of $465.67 by Defendant Karilyn Mora for Plaintiff Ralph Sauceda Reason: No contact with Plaintiff Receipt #CIVIL-2022-00002899
  87. Satisfaction of Judgment in Full filed

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more