Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-12
Status Judgment
Type 47 Small Claims $1,501 $5,000
Docket 65 entries
Disposition notice of entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Largent, Mildred|View Document 8 12 22 's Claim Hrg 10 6 22|View Document 8 12 22 's Claim Hrg 10 6 22
Defendant Hagopian, Jeff|Hagopian, Lisa
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer negin, Stephanie

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer negin, Stephanie

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Comment Method: Mail To: Mildred Largent-response to letter received on
  2. View Document 8-12-22 Plaintiff's Claim HRG 10-6-22
  3. Cause Of Action
  4. Action Plaintiff's Claim
  5. File Date
  6. Proof of Service
  7. View Document -Proof of Service
  8. Proof of Service
  9. View Document -Proof of Service
  10. Plaintiff's Claim and Order SC
  11. Served
  12. Comment Fee:$47.50
  13. Plaintiff's Claim and Order SC
  14. Served
  15. Comment Fee:$100.00
  16. Notice of Hearing
  17. View Document Notice of Hearing 10/6/22
  18. Comment Hearing moved from D-97D to D-402
  19. Court Trial
  20. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  21. Hearing Time 8:45 AM
  22. Result Heard
  23. Plaintiff: Largent, Mildred
  24. Defendant: Hagopian, Jeff
  25. Defendant: Hagopian, Lisa
  26. Minute Order Attachment
  27. View Document Minute Order Attachment
  28. Taken under advisement
  29. Appeared in Person
  30. Chambers Work- Pre
  31. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  32. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  33. Result Taken Under Advisement
  34. Minute Order Attachment
  35. View Document Minute Order Attachment
  36. Notice of Entry of Judgment Mailed to All Parties
  37. Request Filed
  38. View Document 10-28-22 Request Filed
  39. Comment Request to Correct/Cancel Judgment and Answer-by Plaintiff (Hold until 11-14-22)
  40. Chambers Work - Post
  41. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  42. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  43. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  44. Answer Filed
  45. View Document 10-28-22 Answer Filed
  46. Comment Answer for Request to Correct/Cancel Judgment
  47. Answer Filed
  48. View Document 10-28-22 Answer Filed
  49. Comment Answer for Request to Correct/Cancel Judgment
  50. Order Received for Signature
  51. Comment Forwarded to Dept: 402 Order for: Request to Correct/Cancel Judgment
  52. Order Denied
  53. View Document 11-1-22 Order Denied
  54. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  55. Comment Order on Request to Correct/Cancel Judgment
  56. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  57. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the (Order on Request to Correct/Cancel Judgment ) was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on ( ) . Parties served: (All Parties )
  58. Chambers Work- Pre
  59. Judicial Officer Negin, Stephanie
  60. Hearing Time 5:30 PM
  61. Result Chambers Work - Order Submitted for Consideration
  62. Letter Received
  63. View Document 11-21-22 Letter Received
  64. Comment Plaintiff questioning judge's ruling on SC-108
  65. Letter sent

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more