Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-04
Status Judgment
Type 47 Small Claims $5,001 $10,000
Docket 44 entries
Disposition satisfaction of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Cortez Ambrocio, Rigoberto|View Document 8 3 22 's Claim 9 22 22|View Document 8 3 22 's Claim 9 22 22
Defendant Cervantes, Roberto Ramiro
Photo of Hon. Cullers Mark

Judge

Hon. Cullers Mark

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. View Document -Satisfaction of Judgment in Full filed
  2. View Document 8-3-22 Plaintiff's Claim 9-22-22
  3. Order Granting Waiver of Court Fees and Cost Signed
  4. View Document 8-4-22 Order Granting Waiver of Court Fees and Cost Signed
  5. Comment by Deputy Clerk
  6. Cause Of Action
  7. Action Plaintiff's Claim
  8. File Date
  9. Letter of Documents Returned Without Filing
  10. View Document -Letter of Documents Returned Without Filing
  11. Comment SC-150 incomplete
  12. Request Filed
  13. View Document 9-12-22 Request for Postponement Received
  14. Comment Request to Postpone Trial filed by Defendant
  15. Order Granted
  16. View Document 9-13-22 Order Granted
  17. Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark
  18. Comment Order on Court to Postpone Trial
  19. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  20. View Document 9-13-22 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  21. Comment I certify that I am not a party to this cause and a true copy of the Order On Request to Postpone Trial was placed in a sealed envelope and placed for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practice. I am readily familiar with this court's practice for collection and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. Place of Mailing: Fresno, California on 9-13-2022 . Parties served: Rigoberto Cortez Ambrocio (plaintif), Roberto Ramiro Cervantes (defendant)
  22. Proof of Service
  23. View Document 9-19-22 Proof of Service
  24. Plaintiff's Claim and Order SC
  25. Served
  26. Comment Fee $ 185.00
  27. Court Trial
  28. Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark
  29. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  30. Result Heard
  31. Appeared in Person
  32. Minute Order Attachment
  33. View Document Minute Order Attachment
  34. Court Trial
  35. Judicial Officer Cullers, Mark
  36. Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  37. Result Heard
  38. Minute Order Attachment
  39. View Document 12.08.22 Minute Order
  40. Appeared in Person
  41. Notice of Entry of Judgment Mailed to All Parties
  42. Notice of Change of Address Filed
  43. View Document - Notice of Change of Address Filed
  44. Satisfaction of Judgment in Full filed

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more