Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Mahoning County

Court

Mahoning County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-17
Status CLOSED
Type Civil Austintown|Small Claim
Docket 9 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Zack, Laina
Defendant Thomas, Sherman
Photo of Hon. Hunter Administrative Scott D

Judge

Hon. Hunter Administrative Scott D

Mahoning County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. SMALL CLAIM-($2,825.83 AND COSTS) FILED BY PLAINTIFF Receipt: 401405 Date: 08/17/2022
  2. HEARING SCHEDULED Event: SMALL CLAIM Date: 09/30/2022 Time: 9:15 am Judge: DESANTO, DONALD Location: COUNTY COURT # 4
  3. Issue Date: 08/22/2022 Service: SMALL CLAIMS COMPLAINT Method: (A) CERTIFIED MAIL Cost Per: $0.00 THOMAS, SHERMAN 4833 WESTCHESTER DR APT 303 AUSTINTOWN, OH 44515 Tracking No: 941472669904218571739
  4. SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Method : (A) CERTIFIED MAIL Issued : 08/22/2022 Service : SMALL CLAIMS COMPLAINT Served : 08/24/2022 Return : 08/25/2022 On : THOMAS, SHERMAN Signed By : SHERMAN THOMAS Reason : (A) SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Comment : Tracking #: 941472669904218571739
  5. DECISION OF MAGSITRATE: THIS CAUSE CAME ON FOR HEARING ON THE PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. THE PLAINTIFF APPEARED. THE DEFENDANT APPEARED. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM INVOLVES A TIME SHARE ALLEGEDLY PURCHASED JOINTLY BY THE PARTIES. THE PARTIES SUBSEQUENTLY SIGNED A CONTRACT FOR REPAYMENT. SEE PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT 1. THE DEFENDANT ACKNOWLEDGED THE DATE OF PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT 1 HIS SIGNATURE THEREON AND THAT THERE WAS A BALANCE THROUGH DISPUTED, OWING TO PLAINTIFF. THE DEFENDANT AGREED HE PAID $1,000.00 WHICH TEH PLAINTIFF ACKNOWLEGES. THOUGH THE DEFENDANT ARGUES CASH PAYMENTS ALL OF SOME WERE APPARENTLY BEFORE EXECUTION OF PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT 1. WITH CREDIT FOR THE $1,000.00 IN PAYMENTS THE AMOUNT OWING IS $2,925.83. THE COURT GRANTS JUDGMENT FOR THE PLAINTIFF AGAINST THE DEFENDANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,725.83 AND INTEREST AT THE STATUTORY RATE FROM THE DATE OF JUDGMENT AND COSTS. /S/MAGISTRATE DONALD J DESANTO
  6. DECISION OF MAGISTRATE SENT TO LAINA ZACK AND SHERMAN THOMAS
  7. JOURNAL ENTRY ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE’S DECISION: The attached decision was filed by the Magistrate of this Court on 9/30/22. The Court finds that no written objections have been timely filed. The Court has conducted an independent review of the Magistrate’s Decision and finds that such Decision is well supported and there is no error or defect on the face of such Decision. Accordingly, such attached Magistrate’s Decision is adopted in its entirety, pursuant to Civil Rule 53(D)(4), as a permanent Order of the Court. /S/JUDGE SCOTT D HUNTER
  8. $35.00
  9. $0.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more