Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Mahoning County

Court

Mahoning County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-07-25
Status CLOSED
Type Civil Austintown|Small Claim Two Defts
Docket 27 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Estok, Angel
Defendant Dimuzio, Anthony James|Alli, Michael
Photo of Hon. Hunter Administrative Scott D

Judge

Hon. Hunter Administrative Scott D

Mahoning County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. SMALL CLAIM FILED Receipt: 400315 Date: 07/25/2022
  2. ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS Receipt: 400315 Date: 07/25/2022
  3. HEARING SCHEDULED Event: SMALL CLAIM Date: 09/09/2022 Time: 11:00 am Judge: DESANTO, DONALD Location: COUNTY COURT # 4
  4. Issue Date: 07/27/2022 Service: SMALL CLAIMS COMPLAINT Method: (A) CERTIFIED MAIL Cost Per: $0.00 DIMUZIO, ANTHONY JAMES 420 MISTLETOE AVENUE YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44511 Tracking No: 941472669904218571588
  5. Issue Date: 07/27/2022 Service: SMALL CLAIMS COMPLAINT Method: (A) CERTIFIED MAIL Cost Per: $0.00 ALLI, MICHAEL 4054 ST ANDREWS CT APT 5 CANFIELD, OH 44406 Tracking No: 941472669904218571589
  6. UNSUCCESSFUL SERVICE Method : (A) CERTIFIED MAIL Issued : 07/27/2022 Service : SMALL CLAIMS COMPLAINT Served : 07/29/2022 Return : 08/17/2022 On : ALLI, MICHAEL Signed By : Reason : (A) UNSUCCESSFUL SERVICE Comment : UNCLAIMED Tracking #: 941472669904218571589
  7. UNSUCCESSFUL SERVICE Method : (A) CERTIFIED MAIL Issued : 07/27/2022 Service : SMALL CLAIMS COMPLAINT Served : 07/27/2022 Return : 08/18/2022 On : DIMUZIO, ANTHONY JAMES Signed By : Reason : (A) UNSUCCESSFUL SERVICE Comment : INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS Tracking #: 941472669904218571588
  8. FAILURE OF SERVICE SENT TO ATTY / PLAINTIFF ALIAS SERVICE Sent on: 08/22/2022 12:40:34.59
  9. FAILURE OF SERVICE SENT TO ATTY / PLAINTIFF FAILURE OF SERVICE Sent on: 08/22/2022 14:23:50.85
  10. ALIAS/CERT OF MAILING - MICHAEL ALLI Receipt: 402065 Date: 09/06/2022
  11. Issue Date: 09/06/2022 Service: SMALL CLAIMS COMPLAINT Method: (A) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Cost Per: $ ALLI, MICHAEL 4054 ST ANDREWS CT APT 5 CANFIELD, OH 44406 Tracking No: M000016212
  12. DECISON OF MAGISTRATE: CASE CONTINUED FOR 60 DAYS TO PERFECT SERVICE. /S/MAGISTRAE DONALD J DESANTO
  13. HEARING SCHEDULED Event: SMALL CLAIM Date: 11/18/2022 Time: 11:00 am Judge: DESANTO, DONALD Location: COUNTY COURT # 4
  14. DECISION OF MAGISTRATE AND NOTICE OF SMALL CLAIMS HEARING SENT TO ANGEL ESTOK, ATHONY JAEMS DIUZIO, AND MICHAEL ALLI
  15. UNSUCCESSFUL SERVICE - HEARING NOTICE Method : (A) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Issued : 09/06/2022 Service : SMALL CLAIMS COMPLAINT Served : Return : 09/15/2022 On : ALLI, MICHAEL Signed By : Reason : (A) UNSUCCESSFUL SERVICE Comment : ATTEMPTED/NOT KNOWN Tracking #: M000016212
  16. JOURNAL ENTRY ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE’S DECISION: The attached decision was filed by the Magistrate of this Court on 9/9/22. The Court finds that no written objections have been timely filed. The Court has conducted an independent review of the Magistrate’s Decision and finds that such Decision is well supported and there is no error or defect on the face of such Decision. Accordingly, such attached Magistrate’s Decision is adopted in its entirety, pursuant to Civil Rule 53(D)(4), as a permanent Order of the Court. /S/JUDGE SCOTT D HUNTER
  17. DECISION OF MAGISTRATE: This cause came on for hearing on the plaintiff’s complaint. The plaintiff appeared. The defendant Michael Alli failed to appear although duly notified according to Ohio law. The plaintiff presented evidence and exhibits. See attachment to the complaint reflecting payment of $800.00 for concrete work that was never started or completed. The Court grants judgment for the plaintiff (s), against the defendant (s) Michael Alli, only, in the amount of $800.00 and interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment and costs. Case dismissed for lack of service as to defendant , Anthony James Dimuzio /S/MAGISTRATE DONALD J DESANTO
  18. DECISION OF MAGISTRATE SENT TO ANGEL ESTOK, ANTHONY JAMES DIMUZIO, AND MICHAEL ALLI
  19. MAGISTRATE'S DECISION RETURNED IN MAIL. MICHAEL ALLI - INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS.
  20. JOURNAL ENTRY ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE’S DECISION: The attached decision was filed by the Magistrate of this Court on 11/18/22. The Court finds that no written objections have been timely filed. The Court has conducted an independent review of the Magistrate’s Decision and finds that such Decision is well supported and there is no error or defect on the face of such Decision. Accordingly, such attached Magistrate’s Decision is adopted in its entirety, pursuant to Civil Rule 53(D)(4), as a permanent Order of the Court. /S/JUDGE SCOTT D HUNTER
  21. JOURNAL ENTRY ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S DECISION RETURNED IN MAIL. ANTHONY JAMES DIMUZIO - NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED.
  22. $35.00
  23. $10.00
  24. $0.00
  25. $0.00
  26. $0.00
  27. $5.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more