Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Docket Entries
- SMALL CLAIM FILED Receipt: 400302 Date: 07/25/2022
- HEARING SCHEDULED Event: SMALL CLAIM Date: 09/09/2022 Time: 11:00 am Judge: DESANTO, DONALD Location: COUNTY COURT # 4
- Issue Date: 07/27/2022 Service: SMALL CLAIMS COMPLAINT Method: (A) CERTIFIED MAIL Cost Per: $0.00 DIMUZIO, TONY 420 MISTLETOE AVE YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44511 Tracking No: 941472669904218571587
- SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Method : (A) CERTIFIED MAIL Issued : 07/27/2022 Service : SMALL CLAIMS COMPLAINT Served : 08/04/2022 Return : 08/04/2022 On : DIMUZIO, TONY Signed By : TONY DIMUZIO Reason : (A) SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Comment : Tracking #: 941472669904218571587
- DECISION OF MAGISTRATE: This cause came on for hearing on the plaintiff’s complaint. The plaintiff appeared. The defendant failed to appear although duly notified according to Ohio law. The plaintiff presented evidence and exhibits. Plaintiff's claim is for return of a deposit for concrete work that was never performed. See proposal attached to the complaint. The Court grants judgment for the plaintiff (s), against the defendant (s) in the amount of $300.00 and interest at the statutory rate from the date of judgment and costs. /S/MAGISTRATE DONALD J DESANTO
- DECISION OF MAGISTRATE SENT TO NANCY A MASHISHKA AND TONY DIMUZIO
- JOURNAL ENTRY ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE’S DECISION: The attached decision was filed by the Magistrate of this Court on 9/9/22. The Court finds that no written objections have been timely filed. The Court has conducted an independent review of the Magistrate’s Decision and finds that such Decision is well supported and there is no error or defect on the face of such Decision. Accordingly, such attached Magistrate’s Decision is adopted in its entirety, pursuant to Civil Rule 53(D)(4), as a permanent Order of the Court. /S/JUDGE SCOTT D HUNTER
- $35.00
- $0.00
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In