Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-15
Type Writ Of Mandamus
Docket 115 entries
Photo of Hon. Hogan, Mike

Judge

Hon. Hogan, Mike

McIntosh County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
  2. SUMMONS ISSUED BACK TO ATTORNEY ON DEFT. JIM FARRIS
  3. WARDEN OF OKLAHOMA STATE PENITENTIARY
  4. BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
  5. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
  6. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR
  7. EVIDNETIARY HEARING, AND PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR ORDER
  8. FACILITATING PROPER EVALUATION OF PETITIONER BY EXPERTS
  9. AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT.
  10. APPENDIX OF EXHIBITS
  11. PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR ORDER FACILITATING PROPER
  12. EVALUTATION OF PETITIONER BY EXPERTS AND BRIEF IN
  13. SUPPORT
  14. PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING
  15. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FOR PLAINTIFF, ATTORNEY THOMAS D.
  16. HIRD
  17. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FOR PLAINTIFF, ATTORNEY KATRINA
  18. CONRAD-LEGLER
  19. MOTION TO AFFIRM MR. COLE'S INDIGENCY STATUS AND WAIVE
  20. THE FILING FEES IN THE CURRENT PROCEEDINGS
  21. ORDER AFFIRMING INDIGENCY AND WAIVING FILING FEES
  22. ORDER SETTING HEARING, SET FOR SEPT. 21, 2022 AT
  23. 9:00AM. S/HOGAN
  24. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE; ASHLEY L. WILLIS & TESSA L. HENRY
  25. FOR JIM FARRIS.
  26. MOTION TO STRIKE OR RESCHEDULE STATUS CONFERENCE SET
  27. FOR SEPT 21, 2022, AND TO ESTABLISH EXPEDITED SCHEDULE.
  28. PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO STRIKE
  29. OR RESCHEDULE STATUS CONFERENCE SET FOR SEPTEMBER 21,
  30. 2022, AND TO ESTABLISH EXPEDITED SCHEDULE, AND
  31. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE DISCOVERY
  32. CAPITAL CASE
  33. CASE NO. CV-22-140
  34. IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR PITTSBURG COUNTY STATE
  35. OF OKLAHOMA.
  36. IN RE: BENJAMIN R. COLE
  37. RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S MOTION TO EXPIDITE DISCOVERY
  38. CAPITAL CASE
  39. CASE NO. CV-22-140
  40. IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR PITTSBURG COUNTY STATE
  41. OF OKLAHOMA
  42. IN RE: BENJAMIN R. COLE
  43. RESPONDENDENT'S OBJECTION TO PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR
  44. ORDER FACILITATING PROPER EVALUATION OF PETITIONER BY
  45. EXPERTS AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
  46. CAPITAL CASE
  47. CASE NO. CV-22-140
  48. IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR PITTSBURG COUNTY STATE
  49. OF OKLAHOMA
  50. IN RE: BENJAMIN R. COLE
  51. RESPONDENT'S OBJECTION TO PETITIONER'S MOTIN FOR
  52. EVIDNETIARY HEARING
  53. CAPITAL CASE
  54. CASE NO. CV-22-140
  55. IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR PITTSBURG COUNTY STAE
  56. OF OKLAHOMA
  57. IN RE: BENJAMIN R. COLE
  58. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
  59. PETITIONER'S OMNIBUS REPLY TO RESPONDENT'S RESPONSES TO
  60. PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, MOTION FOR E
  61. EVIDENTIARY HEARING, MOTION FOR ORDER FACILITATING
  62. PROPER EVALUATION OF PETITIONER BY EXPERTS, AND MOTION
  63. TO EXPEDITE DISCOVERY
  64. PETITIONER BENJAMIN R. COLE'S MOTION FOR STAY OF
  65. EXECUTION AND BRIEF IN SUPPPORT
  66. CAPITAL CASE
  67. CASE NO. CV-22-140
  68. IN RE: BENJAMIN R. COLE
  69. RESPONEDENT'S OBJECTION TO PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR STAY
  70. OF EXECUTION AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
  71. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE - ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
  72. JENNIFER L. CRABB ENTERS HER APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF
  73. WARDEN JIM FARRIS. ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL CRABB
  74. JOINS ASSISTANT ATTORNEYS GENERAL ASHLEY L. WILLIS AND
  75. TESSA L. HENRY AS COUNSEL.
  76. RESPONDENT'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
  77. OF LAW
  78. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
  79. CM 8-31-22, COMES ON FOR: MOTION TO STAY AND REQUEST TO
  80. CONDUCT WRITTEN DISCOVERY. COUNSEL OF RECORD APPEARS.
  81. RULING: CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 14, 2022 AT 9:00AM.
  82. S/HOGAN
  83. CM 9-7-22, COMES ON FOR: MOTION TO STAY & REQUEST TO
  84. CONDUCT WRITTEN DISCOVERY. COUNSEL OF RECORD APPEARS.
  85. RULING: EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS SET ON SEPTEMBER 30,
  86. 2022 AT 9:00AM. PETITIONER'S COUNSEL WILL CALL TWO
  87. WITNESSES: WARDEN JIM FARRIS AND BENJAMIN R. COLE.
  88. OTHER WITNESSES OF EACH PARTY TO BE SUBMITTED BY
  89. REPORTS. S/HOGAN
  90. APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM
  91. WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM. SET FOR 9-30-22
  92. AT 9A.M. BEFORE JUDGE HOGAN. /S/MILLS
  93. PETITIONER BENJAMIN R. COLE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT
  94. AND CONCLUSIONS OF LA REGARDING THE NEED FOR AN
  95. EVIDENTIARY HEARING
  96. NOTICE OF FILING, HAVE 2 COPIES AND ORIGINAL W/DRAWN OF
  97. TRANSCRIPT OF PROC. 9-7-22 BEFORE JUDGE HOGAN REPORTED
  98. BY KRISTY EVANS, COURT REPORTER
  99. CM 9-21-22. MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION. BOTH PARTIES
  100. AGREE TO BE STRICKEN. EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS SET ON
  101. 9-30-22 AT 9A.M. /S/HOGAN
  102. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  103. PETITIONER'S EXHIBIT LIST
  104. ORDER ADDRESSING BENJAMIN R. COLE'S REQUEST FOR A WRIT
  105. OF MANDAMUS S/HOGAN
  106. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
  107. MOTION TO AFFIRM MR. COLE'S INDIGENCY STATUS AND WAIVE
  108. THE FILING FEES IN THE CURRENT PROCEEDINGS
  109. NOTICE OF FILING; AN ORIGINAL AND 2 COPIES OF THE
  110. TRANSCRIPTS OF HEARING HELD ON 9/30/22 W/D ORIGINAL AND
  111. LEFT 2 COPIES. FILED BY SHANNON DUNCAN, REPORTER
  112. ORDER DENYING EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF. S/ROWLAND,
  113. S/HUDSON, S/LUMPKIN, S/LEWIS, S/MUSSEMAN
  114. TRANSCRIPTS AND EXHIBITS WITHDRAWN FOR APPEAL PROCESS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more