Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Case Information
Filed
2023-03-10
Status
Open
Type
Intellectual Property
Docket
26 entries
Parties
Plaintiff
Terry Mc Kane, In The Right Of And For The Benefit Of, Active Design Polymer, Llc
Defendant
Walsh, Myles A|Fisher, Steven W.|Epaint Company|Smartpaint, Inc.|Netminder, Llc|Leonard, James D
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- Stipulation of dismissal with Prejudice, without Costs, all appellate rights waived as to Terry McKane, in the Right of and for the Benefit of, Active Design Polymer, LLC's original complaint
- Civil action cover sheet filed.
- Service Returned for Defendant Netminder, LLC: Service via certified mail; C/O The Company Corp., 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE, on April 11, 2023. QUESTIONABLE SERVICE
- Service Returned for Defendant Walsh, Myles A: Service accepted by counsel; David V. Lawler, Esq. Service also accepted by counsel David V. Lawler for EPAINT Company and SMARTPAINT, Inc. In addition the parties stipulate that these three Defendants have until May 12, 2023 to a file a responsive pleading
- Plaintiff Terry McKane, in the Right of and for the Benefit of, Active Design Polymer, LLC's Request for Default Applies To: Netminder, LLC (Defendant)
- Plaintiff Terry McKane, in the Right of and for the Benefit of, Active Design Polymer, LLC's EMERGENCY Motion to Enlarge Time for Service of Process
- Endorsement on Request for Default as to defendant Netminder, LLC (#5.0): DENIED without prejudice
- Endorsement on Motion to extend time for service of process (#6.0): ALLOWED Judge: Hogan, Hon. Maureen
- Service Returned for Defendant Leonard, James D: Service made in hand;
- Service Returned for Defendant Fisher, Steven W.: Service made at last and usual; delivered to Joan Fisher, wife
- Plaintiff Terry McKane, in the Right of and for the Benefit of, Active Design Polymer, LLC's Joint Motion to extend tracking deadline(s)
- Endorsement on Motion to extend tracking deadline(s) (#9.0): ALLOWED Service extended to 10/10/23 Answer extended to 11/10/23
- Rule 9A list of documents filed.
- SPECIAL NOTICE OF APPEARANCE On this date Paul J Klehm, Esq. added as Special Appearance for Defendant Steven W. Fisher
- Defendant Steven W. Fisher's Assented to Motion to file a response of pleading
- Affidavit of compliance with Superior Court Rule 9A, Superior Court Rule 9C Applies To: Klehm, Esq., Paul J (Attorney) on behalf of Fisher, Steven W. (Defendant)
- Endorsement on Motion to file a response of pleading (#10.2): ALLOWED see endorsement of 7/25/23 on P#9
- ANSWER; received from Defendant Leonard, James D: Answer to original complaint.
- Rule 9A list of documents filed. Applies To: Klehm, Esq., Paul J (Attorney) on behalf of Fisher, Steven W. (Defendant)
- Defendant Steven W. Fisher's Assented to Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint
- Affidavit of compliance with Superior Court Rule 9A, Superior Court Rule 9C Applies To: Klehm, Esq., Paul J (Attorney) on behalf of Fisher, Steven W. (Defendant)
- Endorsement on Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint (#12.1): ALLOWED
- Plaintiff, Defendants Terry McKane, in the Right of and for the Benefit of, Active Design Polymer, LLC, Myles A Walsh, Steven W. Fisher, Epaint Company, Smartpaint, Inc., Netminder, LLC, James D Leonard's Joint Motion for approval of settlement and to impound
- Endorsement on Motion to Approve Settlement and Impound (Joint) (#13.0): Other action taken Settlement Agreement to be submitted for in camera review pursuant to Trial Court Impoundment Rule 2.
- Docket Note: 2 Settlement Agreements, filed in a manila envelope for Judicial Review, received this day and provided to Hon. Thomas J. Perrino.
- Endorsement on Motion for approval of settlement and to impound (#13.0): ALLOWED The confidential settlement agreement was submitted for review pursuant to the above order. Upon review and having considered the relevant factors, the motion to approve the settlement and to impound the agreement is ALLOWED. The settlement is now impounded, in a sealed manila envelope in the Clerk's vault. [Counsel shall submit either a Stipulation of Dismissal or an Agreement for Judgment within 30 days or the case will be dismissed without prejudice].
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In
