Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-03-14
Type Dissolution Dismissed
Docket 70 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Ansley Bennettmelissa,
Defendant Bennettdaviddewayne,
Photo of Hon. Hammers Pamela B

Judge

Hon. Hammers Pamela B

Creek County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL INTERPRETER TRANSLATOR
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. SUMMONS ISSUED TO DAVID DEWAYNE BENNETT RETURN TO ATTY
  14. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER
  15. SUMMONS RETURNED SERVED TO DAVID DEWAYNE BENNETT ON
  16. 3-14-23
  17. CM:LF:NO CSR: 3-14-23 - MR. BENNETT SERVED IN OPEN
  18. COURT W/DIVORCE PAPERWORK SET 4-20-23 @ 9:30A.M.
  19. BEFORE JUDGE HAMMERS
  20. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE: STEVEN WYERS FOR THE RESPONDENT
  21. RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE AND COUNTERCLAIM FOR DISSOLUTION
  22. OF MARRIAGE
  23. RESPONDENT'S ANSWER AND COUNTER-APPLICATION FOR
  24. TEMPORARY ORDER
  25. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  26. CM:PH:NO CSR: CONTINUED BY AGREEMENT TO 5-25-23 @ 9:30
  27. AM
  28. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
  29. ORDER SETTING HEARING
  30. CM:PH:NO CSR:5-25-23: CONTINUED BY AGREEMENT TO 8-17-23
  31. @ 9:30 AM
  32. PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER
  33. NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION AND SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM-
  34. ISSUED TO: MELISSA ANN ANSLEY-BENNETT
  35. CM:PH:NO CSR 8-17-23 TEMP ORDER/MTN TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
  36. - CONTINUED TO 9-28-23 @ 9:30 TO STATUS
  37. CM:PH:NO CSR 9-28-23 PO STATUS, TEMPORARY ORDER
  38. HEARING, PETITIONER'S MOTION TO COMPEL - PARTIES
  39. ANNOUNCE READY FOR PRE-TRIAL. PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE SET
  40. FOR 12/7/23 AT 3:00 PM. PARTIES WAIVED TEMPORARY ORDER
  41. HEARING WITH ISSUES TO BE HEARD AT TRIAL. PO-23-43
  42. CONTINUED TO 1/22/23 WITH THE MATTER TO BE HEARD AT
  43. TRIAL. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO COMPEL BASED UPON
  44. DISCOVERY ISSUED ON 3/23/23 WAS FILED ON 5/23/23. THE
  45. MOTION TO COMPEL WAS INITIALLY SET FOR 8/17/23 AND
  46. CONTINUED TO 9/28/23. RESPONDENT DID NOT PROVIDE
  47. RESPONSES UNTIL 9/27/23. PETITIONER'S MOTION TO COMPEL
  48. HELD IN ABEYANCE. TRIAL SET FOR 1/22/23 @ 9:30 AM.
  49. CM:PH:NO CSR 9-28-23 TEMPORARY ORDER/MOTION TO COMPEL
  50. DISCOVERY - PRETRIAL 12-7-23 @ 3:00. TRIAL 1-22-24
  51. ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE
  52. AGREED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE
  53. CM:PH:NO CSR 12-6-23 ANNOUNCEMENT - PER THE AGREED
  54. ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE PARTIES' COUNSEL, DUE TO
  55. OUTSTANDING DISCOVERY ISSUES PRE-TRIAL AND TRIAL WILL
  56. NEED TO BE CONTINUED. THE PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR
  57. 12/7/23 SHALL BE CONTINUED TO 1/18/24 @ 3:00 PM. THE
  58. TRIAL SET FOR 1/22/24 IS STRICKEN. NEW TRIAL DATE WILL
  59. BE GIVEN AT PRE-TRIAL
  60. CM:PH:NO CSR 12-6-23 - PRE-TRIAL - CONTINUED BY
  61. AGREEMENT TO 1-18-24 @ 3:00
  62. MOTION TO COMPEL
  63. CM:PH:NO CSR: CAUSE COMES ON FOR PRE-TRIAL.
  64. RULING/FINDINGS BY THE COURT: UPON SIGNING THIS ORDER
  65. PLAINTIFF AGREES TO DISMISS PO-23-61 AND DISMISSES HER
  66. PETITION FOR DIVORCE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. MR. WYERS ON
  67. BEHALF OF HIS CLIENT AGREES TO DISMISS HIS COUNTERCLAIM
  68. WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PROTECTIVE ORDER COSTS WAIVED.
  69. CM:PH:NO CSR 1/18/24 DISMISSED BY PETITIONER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more