Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Cuyahoga County

Court

Cuyahoga County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-03-10
Status INACTIVE
Type Contract
Docket 28 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Credit Acceptance Corporation
Defendant Damon Westley
Photo of Hon. SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD

Judge

Hon. SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD

Cuyahoga County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED: COMPLAINT
  2. JUDGMENT ENTRY(51392251) SENT BY REGULAR MAIL SERVICE. TO: DAMON WESTLEY 5983B GLENWAY DRIVE BROOKPARK, OH 44142-0000
  3. JUDGMENT ENTRY(51392250) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RYAN S. BUNDY [email protected]
  4. JUDGMENT ENTRY(51392249) SENT BY EMAIL. TO: RYAN S. BUNDY [email protected]
  5. NOTICE FILED BY P1 CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION ATTORNEY RYAN S. BUNDY 0090027 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
  6. PURSUANT TO PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF DISMISSAL FILED AND EFFECTIVE 08/15/23, THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 41(A). IT IS SO ORDERED. COURT COST ASSESSED TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 58(B), THE CLERK OF COURTS IS DIRECTED TO SERVE THIS JUDGMENT IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIV.R. 5(B). THE CLERK MUST INDICATE ON THE DOCKET THE NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF ALL PARTIES, THE METHOD OF SERVICE, AND THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SERVICE. NOTICE ISSUED
  7. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 08/30/2023 AT 01:45 PM. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES, IN WRITING, OF THIS DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT IN PERSON AND TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE BE PRESENT IN PERSON. FAILURE OF ANY KIND OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO APPEAR AT THIS PROPERLY SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. DISCOVERY IS TO START IMMEDIATELY. PARTIES TO BE READY WITH DEMAND AND OFFER OF SETTLEMENT. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES ARE CONDUCTED IN PERSON; TELEPHONE ATTENDANCE IS NOT PERMITTED FOR ANY REASON. DO NOT CALL THE COURT REQUESTING TELEPHONE APPEARANCE. NOTICE ISSUED. NOTICE ISSUED
  8. THIS ACTION WAS FILED ON 03/10/23. PLAINTIFF HAS NOT YET PERFECTED SERVICE UPON DEFENDANT. PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE EFFORTS TO PERFECT SERVICE ON DEFENDANT. FAILURE TO PERFECT SERVICE ON OR BEFORE 09/10/23 WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 4(E) AND/OR CIV. R. 41(B). NOTICE ISSUED. NOTICE ISSUED
  9. DUE TO THE FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT DAMON WESTLEY, THE CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 08/02/23 IS HEREBY CANCELLED. PLAINTIFF SHALL CONTINUE EFFORTS TO PERFECT SERVICE ON DEFENDANT. FAILURE TO PERFECT SERVICE BY 09/11/23 OR TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY SERVICE CANNOT BE HAD WITHIN THIS TIME FRAME WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E). NOTICE ISSUED. IT IS SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  10. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 08/02/2023 AT 01:45 PM IS CANCELLED.
  11. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 08/02/2023 AT 01:45 PM. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES, IN WRITING, OF THIS DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT IN PERSON AND TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE BE PRESENT IN PERSON. FAILURE OF ANY KIND OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO APPEAR AT THIS PROPERLY SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. DISCOVERY IS TO START IMMEDIATELY. PARTIES TO BE READY WITH DEMAND AND OFFER OF SETTLEMENT. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES ARE CONDUCTED IN PERSON; TELEPHONE ATTENDANCE IS NOT PERMITTED FOR ANY REASON. DO NOT CALL THE COURT REQUESTING TELEPHONE APPEARANCE. NOTICE ISSUED. NOTICE ISSUED
  12. DUE TO THE FAILURE OF SERVICE ON DEFENDANT DAMON WESTLEY, THE CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 07/05/2023 AT 02:15 PM IS HEREBY CANCELLED. PLAINTIFF SHALL CONTINUE EFFORTS TO PERFECT SERVICE ON DEFENDANT. FAILURE TO PERFECT SERVICE WITHIN SIX MONTHS OF FILING OR TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY SERVICE CANNOT BE HAD WITHIN THIS TIME FRAME WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E). NOTICE ISSUED. IT IS SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  13. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 07/05/2023 AT 02:15 PM IS CANCELLED.
  14. CASE MGMNT CONFERENCE SET FOR 07/05/2023 AT 02:15 PM. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL INFORM ALL OPPOSING COUNSEL AND/OR PRO SE PARTIES, IN WRITING, OF THIS DATE AND TIME. COUNSEL FOR ALL PARTIES ARE REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT IN PERSON AND TO BE FAMILIAR WITH THE UNDERLYING FACTS OF THE CASE. PARTIES NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL SHALL LIKEWISE BE PRESENT IN PERSON. FAILURE OF ANY KIND OF THE AFOREMENTIONED PERSONS TO APPEAR AT THIS PROPERLY SCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OF THE CASE AND/OR JUDGMENT BEING RENDERED. DISCOVERY IS TO START IMMEDIATELY. PARTIES TO BE READY WITH DEMAND AND OFFER OF SETTLEMENT. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES ARE CONDUCTED IN PERSON; TELEPHONE ATTENDANCE IS NOT PERMITTED FOR ANY REASON. DO NOT CALL THE COURT REQUESTING TELEPHONE APPEARANCE. NOTICE ISSUED. NOTICE ISSUED
  15. 05/15/23 DOCKET ENTRY STATES THAT CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE ON DEFENDANT WAS NOT RETURNED BY THE USPS AFTER 60 DAYS. PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE EFFORTS TO PERFECT SERVICE ON DEFENDANT. FAILURE TO PERFECT SERVICE WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF FILING OR SHOW GOOD CAUSE WHY SUCH SERVICE HAS NOT BEEN MADE WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E). NOTICE ISSUED. IT IS SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  16. CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER 50086353 ADDRESSED TO DAMON WESTLEY(D1) NOT RETURNED BY THE U.S. POSTAL SERVICE AFTER 60 DAYS. NOTICE MAILED TO PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
  17. AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ENTRY, 03/14/23 CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE OF THE SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT UPON DEFENDANT DAMON WESTLEY HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED BY THE USPS. PLAINTIFF TO CONTINUE EFFORTS TO PERFECT SERVICE ON DEFENDANT. FAILURE TO PERFECT SERVICE WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF FILING WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO CIV.R. 4(E). NOTICE ISSUED. IT IS SO ORDERED. NOTICE ISSUED
  18. SUMS COMPLAINT(50086353) SENT BY CERTIFIED MAIL. TO: DAMON WESTLEY 5983B GLENWAY DRIVE BROOKPARK, OH 44142-0000
  19. SUMMONS E-FILE COPY COST
  20. WRIT FEE
  21. JUDGE SHIRLEY STRICKLAND SAFFOLD ASSIGNED (RANDOM)
  22. LEGAL RESEARCH
  23. LEGAL NEWS
  24. LEGAL AID
  25. COURT SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND
  26. COMPUTER FEE
  27. CLERK'S FEE
  28. DEPOSIT AMOUNT PAID RYAN S. BUNDY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more