Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-17
Status Pending
Type Defamation
Docket 72 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Lutz, Zachary Alan
Defendant Moczygemba, Arleen Carol

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. REQUEST FOR SERVICE AND PROCESS
  2. New Cases Filed (OCA)
  3. PETITION
  4. Unserved
  5. FIRST AMENDED PETITION
  6. TEMP REST ORD, AND ORD SETTING HRG FOR RQST FOR TEMP INJ
  7. (Judicial Officer: ALVARADO, ROSIE)
  8. SURETY BOND
  9. Party:
  10. Plaintiff Lutz, Zachary Alan
  11. Party 2:
  12. Defendant Moczygemba, Arleen Carol
  13. REQUEST FOR SERVICE AND PROCESS
  14. Served: 11/09/2022
  15. Served: 11/09/2022
  16. Served: 11/09/2022
  17. RETURN OF SERVICE - SUCCESSFUL
  18. RETURN OF SERVICE - SUCCESSFUL
  19. RETURN OF SERVICE - SUCCESSFUL
  20. NOTICE OF ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEY OF
  21. RULE 11 AGREEMENT
  22. ORIGINAL ANSWER OF
  23. MOTION TO
  24. ORDER TO SUBSTITUTE
  25. (Judicial Officer: Canales, David A.)
  26. LETTER TO DISTRICT CLERK
  27. MOTION TO
  28. ORDER TO WITHDRAW
  29. (Judicial Officer: CHAPA, CYNTHIA MARIE)
  30. LETTER TO DISTRICT CLERK
  31. AMENDED ANSWER OF
  32. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  33. MOTION TO COMPEL
  34. NOTICE OF HEARING
  35. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
  36. NOTICE OF HEARING
  37. SERVICE ASSIGNED TO CLERK 3
  38. REQUEST FOR SERVICE AND PROCESS
  39. JURY DEMAND JURY FEE PAID
  40. JURY DEMAND JURY FEE PAID
  41. ORDER SETTING HEARING
  42. RETURN OF SERVICE - SUCCESSFUL
  43. RETURN OF SERVICE - SUCCESSFUL
  44. ORIGINAL
  45. ORIGINAL
  46. EXHIBITS
  47. MOTION TO STRIKE
  48. NOTICE OF HEARING
  49. AFFIDAVIT OF
  50. HEARING/TRIAL CRT REPORTER ASSIGNED
  51. JUDGES DOCKET NOTES
  52. (Judicial Officer: SALINAS, LAURA)
  53. ORDER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.