Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-11-08
Status Judgment
Type Dafs
Docket 119 entries
Disposition entry of judgment

Parties

Plaintiff County Of Fresno
Defendant Esqueda, Armando J
Photo of Hon. Pebet Noelle

Judge

Hon. Pebet Noelle

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Appeared in Person
  2. Filed Complaint Issued Summons
  3. Paternity
  4. Answer Filed Family Support
  5. Clerk's Certificate of Mailing
  6. Comment DCSS Answer
  7. Proof of Service
  8. Notice of Motion
  9. Comment Judgment, CS, Health Care, Parentage, Genetic Testing, Join Other Parent / HRG: @8am Dept 302
  10. Proof of Service by Mail
  11. Comment Served: Armando J Esqueda, Esperanza G Duque, Mailed on
  12. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  13. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  14. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  15. Result Heard
  16. Motion Child Support
  17. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  18. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  19. Result Heard
  20. Motion - Health Care
  21. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  22. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  32. Result Heard
  33. Motion - Joinder
  34. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  35. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  36. Result Heard
  37. Comment Join Other Parent
  38. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  39. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  40. Appeared in Person
  41. Proof of Service by Mail
  42. Comment Served: Armando J Esqueda, Esperanza G Duque. Mailed on
  43. Motion for Entry of Judgment
  44. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  45. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  46. Result Heard
  47. Comment Cont from to allow DCSS to serve parties with corrected DNA results
  48. Motion Child Support
  49. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  50. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  51. Result Heard
  52. Motion - Health Care
  53. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  54. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  55. Result Heard
  56. General Motion
  57. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  58. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  59. Result Heard
  60. Comment (Parentage)
  61. Genetic Test
  62. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  63. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  64. Result Heard
  65. Motion - Joinder
  66. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  67. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  68. Result Heard
  69. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  70. Appeared in Person
  71. Confidential document filed
  72. Comment genetic test results
  73. Notice of Motion
  74. Comment CS Mod / HRG: @ 8am Dept 302
  75. Proof of Service by Mail
  76. Comment Date mailed: Served: Armando J Esqueda & Esperanza G Duque
  77. Motion Modify Child Support
  78. Original Type Motion Modify Child Support
  79. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  80. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  81. Result Heard
  82. Respondent: ESQUEDA, ARMANDO J
  83. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  84. Commissioner Fogarty Minute Order. See attached.
  85. Appeared in Person
  86. Income and Expense Declaration
  87. Order Granting Waiver of Court Fees and Cost Signed
  88. Motion Modify Child Support
  89. Original Type Companion Case Calendared by Court
  90. Judicial Officer Fogarty, Katherine
  91. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  92. Result Heard
  93. Comment w/ #23CEFL01455
  94. Respondent: ESQUEDA, ARMANDO J
  95. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  96. Appeared in Person
  97. Income and Expense Declaration
  98. Comment Received in open court
  99. Income and Expense Declaration
  100. Comment Received in open court
  101. Minute Order Corrected/Amended
  102. Comment To: Changed the parent's name ordered to pay is "Elizabeth Duque" changed the child's name to: "Zenobia F Esqueda" corrected DCSS# to: 200000002527886; 200000002661688"
  103. Minute Order Corrected/Amended
  104. Comment 2nd Corrected
  105. Motion Filed
  106. Comment MOD CS,Child Debt Reduction/Hrg Date: @8am Dept:302
  107. Motion Modify Child Support
  108. Original Type Motion Modify Child Support
  109. Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle
  110. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  111. Result Heard
  112. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO
  113. General Motion
  114. Original Type General Motion
  115. Judicial Officer Pebet, Noelle
  116. Hearing Time 8:00 AM
  117. Result Heard
  118. Comment Child Debt Reduction
  119. Petitioner: COUNTY OF FRESNO

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more