Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Docket Entries
- PETITION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
- LAW LIBRARY
- DISPUTE MEDIATION
- OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
- OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
- 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
- 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
- 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
- STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
- 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
- COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
- EMERGENCY ORDER OF PROTECTION ISS'D- CC TO PLTF, CC FOR
- PLTF TO TAKE TO PVPD, CC TO GCSO, CC FOR GCSO
- EMERGENCY ORDER OF PROTECTION RET'D- SERVED CARLOS
- PASASI 2/18/23
- S/O: COURT REPORTER NOT REQUESTED. LUPITA ROJAS
- INTERPRETS THIS DATE. PETITIONER AND DEFT APPEAR. DEFT
- ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF EMERGENCY VPO BUT ADVISES HE
- DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE CONTENTS AS HE DOES NOT SPEAK
- ENGLISH. COURT READS THROUGH THE PO VIA INTERPRETER,
- PETITIONER AND DEDT AGREE TO TERMS OF A TEMPORAY VPO
- AND ARE ADVISED THAT CUSTODY AND VISITATION ORDERS MUST
- BE REQUESTED IN A SEPARATE COURT FILING. HRG CONT'D TO
- 8/28/23 @ 1:30 PM IF PETITIONER DOES NOT APPEAR OR
- REQUEST A FINAL ORDER, THE CASE WILL BE DISMISSED. (TM)
- CONT'D ORDER- (COPIES GIVEN OUT BY JUDGE MISAK)
- S/O: PETITIONER APPEARS FOR FINAL HRG. RESPONDENT
- APPEARS NOT. PETITIONER REQUESTS THAT A FINAL ORDER BE
- ENTERED INCLUDING A PROVISION THAT DEFT HAVE NO CONTACT
- WITH HER. COURT ENTERS A 5-YR FINAL ORDER. CLERK TO
- ISSUE A COPY FOR SERVICE BY GCSO AS DEFT APPEARS NOT.
- (TM)
- FINAL ORDER- CC TO PLTF, CC FOR PLTF TO TAKE TO PVPD,
- CC FOR GCSO, CC TO GCSO TO GET SERVICE
- DISMISSING COSTS
- FINAL ORDER RET'D- SERVED CARLOS PASASI 9/6/23
- PLTF'S APPLICATION TO DISMISS EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER
- ORDER DISMISSING EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE ORDER AT REQUEST OF PETITIONER
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In