Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-02-27
Type Judgment
Docket 49 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Lancetimothy,
Defendant Sheaffergerileann,
Photo of Hon. COPPEDGE, WALLACE

Judge

Hon. COPPEDGE, WALLACE

Bryan County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CIVIL COURT REPORTER FEE
  2. LAW LIBRARY
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION
  4. OCIS
  5. LENGHTY TRIAL FUND
  6. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  7. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  9. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  11. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  12. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  13. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  14. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  15. SUMMONS (ISS'D) TO MCSO SERVING: GERI L. SHEAFFER
  16. SHERIFF FEE
  17. SUMMONS (RET'D) FROM MCSO SERVED: GERI SHEAFFER
  18. SUMMONS (RET'D) BY NEIL MAYO SERVING: GERI L SHEAFFER
  19. REQUEST OF PRESIDING JUDGE FOR JUDICIAL ASSIGNMENT
  20. CO: COURT ORDER: THE UNDERSIGNED JUDGE HEREBY RECUSES.
  21. THE CASE IS SET FOR ASSIGNMENT BEFORE JUDGE COPPEDGE.
  22. CO: COURT ORDER: THE UNDERSIGNED JUDGE RETAINS THE
  23. ABOVE CASE.
  24. ENTRY OF APPERANCE AND RESERVATION OF TIME
  25. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  26. ANSWER TO PETITION
  27. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO PERMIT RESPONDENT TO ANSWER OUT OF TIME
  28. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  29. ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING
  30. COURT ORDER: THIS MATTER COMES ON FOR HEARING. THE PLAINTIFF APPEARS IN PERSON, PRO-SE. THE DEFENDANT APPEARS BY ATTORNEY, TARA REUBER. THE PLAINTIFF MADE AN EXPARTE MOTION FOR JUDGE TO RECUSE. THE COURT DENIES THAT MOTION. THIS MATTER IS SET FOR STATUS SEPTEMBER 8, 2023, AT 11:00 A.M.
  31. COURT ORDER: DUE TO A CONFLICT OF THE COURT, THE STATUS HEARING SET ON SEPTEMBER 8, 2023 AT 11:00 A.M. IS HEREBY STRICKEN. THIS STATUS HEARING IS SET SEPTEMBER 15, 2023 AT 10:30 A.M.
  32. SCHEDULING ORDER AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER
  33. PETITIONER'S WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST
  34. RESPONDENT'S WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST
  35. APPLICATION TO AMEND ANSWER TO PETITION
  36. MOTION TO DISMISS
  37. PETITIONER'S WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST
  38. ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER
  39. AMENDED ANSWER TO PETITION
  40. PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
  41. PETITIONER'S SECOND AMENDED WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST
  42. MOTION TO ENTER ON NON-JURY DOCKET
  43. ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING
  44. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
  45. SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
  46. COURT ORDER: THIS MATTER COMES FOR PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE. THE PLAINTIFF APPEARS IN PERSON, PRO-SE. THE RESPONDENT APPEARS IN PERSON AND WITH COUNSEL, KYLIE ROSSITER. THIS MATTER IS SET MAY 17, 2024 AT 9:00 A.M. ON THE MOTION TO QUASH. THE NON-JURY TRIAL IS SET JULY 19, 2024 AT 1:00 P.M.
  47. DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM
  48. JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
  49. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO QUASH

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more