Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Vermont Unified

Court

Vermont Unified

Vermont

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-09-27
Status Disposed - Appeal Pending
Type Claim Against Gov. Election
Docket 49 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Billado, Deborah|Bradley, Christopher|Burke, Theresa|Butterfield, Suzanne|Ferry, Charles|Kalanges, Wendy|Kirker, Linda|Martineau, Maurice|Shepard, Jay|The Republican National Committee|The Vermont Republican Party|Weston, Douglas
Defendant The City Of Montpelier

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Notice to Parties Recipients: Attorney Smith, Rachel E.; Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II; Attorney Toensing, Brady
  2. Supreme Court Entry Order
  3. Notice to Parties Recipients: Attorney Smith, Rachel E.; Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II; Attorney Toensing, Brady; Co-Counsel Hasson, James; Co-Counsel Meehan, Taylor; Co-Counsel Strawbridge, Patrick
  4. Notice of Appeal to Supreme Court Filed by: Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II Appellee: Plaintiff Billado, Deborah; Plaintiff Bradley, Christopher; Plaintiff Burke, Theresa; Plaintiff Butterfield, Suzanne; Plaintiff Ferry, Charles; Plaintiff Kalanges, Wendy; Plaintiff Kirker, Linda; Plaintiff Martineau, Maurice; Plaintiff Shepard, Jay; Plaintiff The Republican National Committee; Plaintiff The Vermont Republican Party; Plaintiff Weston, Douglas
  5. Certificate of Service Filed by: Attorney Toensing, Brady Party for: Attorney Smith, Rachel E.; Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II
  6. Notice of Appeal to Supreme Court Filed by: Attorney Toensing, Brady Appellee: Defendant The City of Montpelier
  7. Case Closed
  8. Order (Judicial Officer: Mello, Robert A.)
  9. Notice to Parties Recipients: Attorney Smith, Rachel E.; Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II; Attorney Toensing, Brady; Co-Counsel Hasson, James; Co-Counsel Meehan, Taylor; Co-Counsel Strawbridge, Patrick
  10. Sent to Case Parties
  11. Proposed Order Filed by: Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II
  12. Notice to Parties Recipients: Attorney Smith, Rachel E.; Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II; Attorney Toensing, Brady; Co-Counsel Hasson, James; Co-Counsel Meehan, Taylor; Co-Counsel Strawbridge, Patrick
  13. Entry Regarding Motion - Granted (Judicial Officer: Mello, Robert A.)
  14. Sent to Case Parties
  15. Hearing Held - Oral Argument (Judicial Officer: Mello, Robert A.)
  16. Notice to Parties Recipients: Attorney Smith, Rachel E.; Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II; Attorney Toensing, Brady; Co-Counsel Hasson, James; Co-Counsel Meehan, Taylor; Co-Counsel Strawbridge, Patrick
  17. Entry Regarding Motion - Granted (Judicial Officer: Mello, Robert A.)
  18. Motion with Judge (Judicial Officer: Mello, Robert A.)
  19. Sent to Case Parties
  20. Memorandum in Opposition Filed by: Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II
  21. Document(s) Filed Filed by: Attorney Toensing, Brady
  22. Motion Filed by: Attorney Toensing, Brady Index # 9
  23. Notice to Parties Recipients: Attorney Smith, Rachel E.; Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II; Attorney Toensing, Brady
  24. Sent to Case Parties
  25. Notice to Parties Recipients: Attorney Smith, Rachel E.; Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II; Attorney Toensing, Brady
  26. Entry Regarding Motion - Granted (Judicial Officer: Mello, Robert A.)
  27. Entry Regarding Motion - Granted (Judicial Officer: Mello, Robert A.)
  28. Notice to Parties Recipients: Attorney Smith, Rachel E.; Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II; Attorney Toensing, Brady
  29. Entry Regarding Motion - Granted (Judicial Officer: Mello, Robert A.)
  30. Sent to Case Parties
  31. Sent to Case Parties
  32. Motion with Judge (Judicial Officer: Mello, Robert A.)
  33. Motion with Judge (Judicial Officer: Mello, Robert A.)
  34. Motion with Judge (Judicial Officer: Mello, Robert A.)
  35. Exhibits Filed by: Attorney Toensing, Brady
  36. Exhibits Filed by: Attorney Toensing, Brady
  37. Exhibits Filed by: Attorney Toensing, Brady
  38. Exhibits Filed by: Attorney Toensing, Brady
  39. Exhibits Filed by: Attorney Toensing, Brady
  40. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filed by: Attorney Toensing, Brady Index # 8
  41. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filed by: Attorney Toensing, Brady Index # 7
  42. Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filed by: Attorney Toensing, Brady Index # 6
  43. Reply to Memo in Opposition Filed by: Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II
  44. Notice to Parties Recipients: Attorney Smith, Rachel E.; Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II; Attorney Toensing, Brady
  45. Notice to Parties Recipients: Attorney Smith, Rachel E.; Attorney Tarrant, Michael John II; Attorney Toensing, Brady
  46. Hearing Cancellation Notice Cxd Hrg Date: 03/10/2022
  47. Sent to Case Parties
  48. Sent to Case Parties
  49. Note

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more