Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-24
Type Grandparental Visitation
Docket 107 entries
Disposition Judgment
Photo of Hon. Tate Stuart

Judge

Hon. Tate Stuart

Osage County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION
  2. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  3. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  4. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  5. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  7. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  9. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  10. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  11. SUMMONS ISSUED BACK TO ATTY FOR SERVICE ON CLINT MORGAN
  12. SUMMONS RETURNED SERVING CLINT MORGAN ON 3/27/22
  13. DEFAULT JOURNAL ENTRY
  14. RETURN OF COMPLETE SERVICE ON CLINT MORGAN
  15. MOTION
  16. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  17. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  18. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  19. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  20. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  21. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  22. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  23. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  24. AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
  25. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
  26. RESPONDENTS RESPONSE TO PETITIONERS PETITION TO
  27. ESTABLISH GRANDPARENTAL VISITATION
  28. MOTION TO SET ASIDE AND STAY DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  29. ORDER SETTING HEARING TO SET ASIDE AND STAY DEFAULT JUDG
  30. MENT
  31. AGREED ORDER SETTING ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  32. PETITIONERS' APPLICATION FOR STATUS CONFERENCE
  33. PETITIONERS' RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR
  34. GUARDIAN AD LITEM APPOINTMENT
  35. PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR COURT REFERRAL TO MEDIATION
  36. ORDER SETTING HEARING PETITIONERS' APPLICATION FOR
  37. STATUS CONFERENCE
  38. CM; SLT; MARTA THIRION + DAVID THIRION W/ ATTY A.
  39. PROCTOR, CLINT MORGAN W/ ATTY JAY BILLS; DUE TO
  40. UNAVAILABILITY OF COURT, MATTER SET FOR 8-24-22 IS
  41. STRICKEN AND RESET FOR STATUS CONF. ON 9-1-22 @ 11:00AM
  42. CT MINUTE
  43. CM; SLT; DAVID THIRION AND MARTA THIRION W/COUNSEL
  44. AMANDA PROCTOR, CLINT MORGAN W/ COUNSEL JAY BILLS;
  45. COMES ON FOR A STATUS CONF. RAE TOWERS APPLIED AS
  46. G.A.L. FOR MINOR CHILD Z.M. HER FEES TO BE SHARED 50/50
  47. BETWEEN THIRION AND MORGAN. COURT ORDERS EITHER
  48. EXISTING COUNSELORS CHOOSE A 3RD COUNSELOR OR PARTIES
  49. AGREE MUTUALLY ON A COUNSELOR TO CONDUCT THERAPEDIC
  50. VISITS W/ MINOR CHILD AND THE PARTIES W/IN 10 DAYS.
  51. COST OF 3RD PARTY COUNSELOR SPLIT 50/50 BETWEEN
  52. PARTIES. G.A.L. REPORT DUE BY 11/30/22. NEXT CONFERENCE
  53. W/ COURT SET 12-19-11 @11:00AM
  54. CT MINUTE
  55. AGREED ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR MINOR
  56. CHILD
  57. AGREED AMENDED ORDER
  58. CM; SLT; PER TELEPHONE ANNOUNCEMENT BY COUNSEL, BY
  59. AGREEMENT "THERAPUDIC" STRICKEN FROM ORDER EMTERED ON
  60. 9-1-22 ALL OTHER LANGUAGE IN 9-1-22 ORDER REMAINS
  61. CT MINUTE
  62. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AND NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF
  63. COUNSEL
  64. CM; SLT; ATTY FOR PETITIONER, ATTY FOR DEFT, OTHER
  65. APPEARANCES GAL RAEGAN JOWERS APPEARING; MATTER COMES
  66. ON FOR STATUS CONFERENCE, GAL REPORT BY JOWERS/ REPORT
  67. BY VOSAT/ AND REPORT OF TROTTER RECEIVED BY COURT.
  68. COURT ORDERS CONTINUED RECONCILIATION THERAPY AND
  69. EXPANDED VISITATION ON RECOMENDATION OF JAMIE VOGT. AS
  70. TO CHRISTMAS VISIT, MINOR CHILD TO VISIT WITH
  71. GRANDPARENTS ON DECEMBER 31, 2022 @ 9AM @ (COLLINSVILLE
  72. QUICK-TRIP 11590 N 140TH E AVE. 74021) FROM FROM
  73. WEEKLONG VISIT TO JAN 1,2023 @6PM. BOTH PARTIES
  74. ADMONISHED TO AVOID BEHAVIORS WHICH CAUSE THE MINOR
  75. CHILD TO FAVOR OR DISFAVOR PARENTS IN THE CASE.
  76. RESPONDENT ORDERED TO PAY GAL IN FULL WITHIN 20 DAYS.
  77. MEDIATION TO OCCUR WITH EARLY SETTLEMENT MEDIATION BY
  78. NEXT REVIEW. REVIEW SET 2-22-2023 @1:00PM
  79. CT MINUTE
  80. CM; SLT; ATTY FOR PLAINTIFF- AMANDA PROCTOR, JAMES
  81. FEAMSTER, ATTY FOR DEFT- TEAFILO DIAZ; MATTER COMES ON
  82. FOR REVIEW, PARTIES ANNOUNCE CASE SETTLED OF MEDIATION
  83. TODAY. JOURNAL ENTRY TO BE CIRCULATED AND PRESENTED TO
  84. THE COURT WITHIN 15 DAYS.
  85. CT MINUTE
  86. AGREED JOURNAL ENTRY
  87. MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR RESPONDANT
  88. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD
  89. FOR PETITIONER
  90. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE OF JUDGMENT, DECREE OR APPEALABLE
  91. ORDER
  92. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE OF JUDGMENT, DECREE OR APPEALABLE
  93. ORDER
  94. APPLICATION FOR ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC
  95. ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC
  96. CM SLT. ATTY FOR PLAINIFF JAMES FEAMSTER. PETITIONER'S COUNSEL PRESENTS APPLICATION NUNC PRO TUNC TO THE ORDER ENTERED BY THEN COURT 3-15-23. THE PREVIOUS ORDER SUBMITTED STATUTORILY REQUIRES LANGUAGE. COURT SUMMARY GRANTS REQUEST ORDER APPROVED.
  97. CT MINUTE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more