Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-03-22
Type Dissolution Of Marriage Dismissed
Docket 58 entries
Disposition dismiss
Photo of Hon. Hogan, Mike

Judge

Hon. Hogan, Mike

McIntosh County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FILE & ENTER PETITION FOR DIVORCE
  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  3. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. SUMMONS ISS. TO ATTY.
  14. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER ( EMAIL COPY)
  15. RESPONDENT'S ANSWER TO PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR
  16. TEMPORARY ORDER AND COUNTERCLAIM FOR DISSOLUTION OF
  17. MARRIAGE.
  18. ORDER SETTING HEARING(4-21-22 @ 9 AM)
  19. CM:(HOGAN) COMES ON FOR APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY
  20. ORDER. PETITIONER APPEARS WITH COUNSEL, EDDIE FORAKER.
  21. RESPONDENT APPEARS WITH COUNSEL, RYAN FERGUSON. PARTIES
  22. HAVE REACHED AN AGREEMENT. JOURNAL ENTRY TO B SUBMITTED
  23. WITH IN (10) DAYS.
  24. AGREED TEMPORARY ORDER
  25. APPLICATION FOR CONTEMPT CITATION
  26. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  27. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  28. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  29. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  30. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  31. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  32. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  33. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  34. CITATION ORDER
  35. ORDER SETTING HEARING (9-22-22 @ 9:00 AM)
  36. CM:(HOGAN) MINUTE ORDER: COMES ON FOR CONTEMPT
  37. CITATION. CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 AT 9:00 A.M.
  38. COURT MINUTE
  39. CM:(HOGAN) MINUTE ORDER: COMES ON FOR CONTEMPT
  40. CITATION. PETITIONER APPEARS WITH COUNSEL. RESPONDENT
  41. APPEARS WITH COUNSEL. PARTIES ENTERED AGREED COURT
  42. MINUTE IN THIS MATTER. STATUS REVIEW: NOVEMBER 17, 2022
  43. AT 9:00 A.M.
  44. CM:(HOGAN) MINUTE ORDER: COMES ON FOR STATUS REVIEW.
  45. PARTIES AGREE TO CONTINUE THIS MATTER TO JANUARY 5,
  46. 2023 AT 9:00 A.M
  47. CM:(HOGAN) MINUTE ORDER: COMES ON FOR STATUS/REVIEW.
  48. PETITIONER APPEARS THROUGH COUNSEL. RESPONDENT APPEARS
  49. THROUGH COUNSEL. PARTIES AGREE TO CONTINUE THIS TO
  50. MARCH 30 23 @9:00 A.M.
  51. CM:(HOGAN) MINUTE ORDER: COMES ON FOR STATUS/REVIEW.
  52. PLAINTIFF APPEARS THROUGH COUSNEL, EDDIE FORAKER.
  53. DEFENDANT APPEARS THROUGH CONSEL, RYAN FERGUSON.
  54. COUNSEL HAVE NO HEARD FROM CLIENTS. DEFENDNAT ORAL
  55. REQUEST TO DISMISS CASE. PLAINTIFF OBJECTS TO
  56. DISMISSAL. THE COURT DISMISSES THISM MATTER OVER
  57. OBJECTION OF PLAINTIFF.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more