Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Santa Fe

Court

Santa Fe

New Mexico

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-12-22
Status CLS: JUDGMENT/ DISPOSITION
Type Malpractice
Docket 106 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Garcia Frank
Defendant Modern Vascular Navajo Llc|Modern Vascular Llc|Modern Vascular Management West Llc|Hootman Kent Md|Gampbel Yury Do|Frohmader Robert|Frame Brent|Foot & Ankle Specialists Of New Mexico P.c.|Mod Vasc Frame Llc|Young David W.
Photo of Hon. Ellenwood, Kathleen Mc Garry

Judge

Hon. Ellenwood, Kathleen Mc Garry

Santa Fe County (NM)

New Mexico

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. LS: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
  2. TN: TO DISMISS
  3. ismissal of Party, Not of Case
  4. TN: TO DISMISS
  5. ismissal of Party, Not of Case
  6. CJ: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
  7. TN: FOR DISMISSAL OF PARTIES
  8. RD: STIPULATED
  9. RD: ORDER GRANTING
  10. TN: TO DISMISS
  11. TN: TO DISMISS
  12. ury Demand 12 Person/No Fee EF
  13. NSWER
  14. TC: NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY
  15. RD: ORDER GRANTING
  16. TC: OF DEPOSITION
  17. TN: Motion to Extend Dates in Scheduling Order
  18. TC: OF DEPOSITION
  19. NTRY OF APPEARANCE
  20. NSWER
  21. NSWER
  22. NSWER
  24. NSWER
  25. NSWER
  26. MENDED COMPLAINT
  27. RD: ORDER GRANTING
  28. TN: MOTION TO AMEND/ MODIFY
  29. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  30. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  31. ury Demand 12 Person/No Fee EF
  32. NSWER
  33. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  34. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  35. TC: NOTICE
  36. RD: RULE 16B SCHEDULING/FORM
  37. TC: OF DEPOSITION
  38. TC: OF DEPOSITION
  39. RD: VACATING HEARING
  40. ismissal of Party, Not of Case
  41. TC: NOTICE
  42. TC: HEARING (VACATE & RESET)
  43. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  44. TC: HEARING (MOTION)
  45. TC: HEARING
  46. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  47. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  48. TC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
  49. EPLY
  50. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  51. TC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
  52. EPLY
  53. ESPONSE
  54. ESPONSE
  55. ESPONSE
  56. ESPONSE
  57. ESPONSE
  58. ismissal of Party, Not of Case
  59. TN: MOTION
  60. TN: MOTION
  61. TC: HEARING
  62. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  63. TC: NOTICE
  64. NTRY OF APPEARANCE
  65. ETURN OF SERVICE
  66. UMMONS RETURN
  67. UMMONS RETURN
  68. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  69. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  70. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  71. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  72. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  73. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  74. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  75. NTRY OF APPEARANCE
  76. NSWER
  77. NTRY OF APPEARANCE
  78. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  79. NSWER
  80. NSWER
  81. ury Demand 12 Person/No Fee EF
  82. NSWER
  83. ury Additional 6 / Total 12 (EF) $150
  84. NSWER
  85. DG: NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT
  86. NTRY OF APPEARANCE
  87. UMMONS RETURN
  88. UMMONS RETURN
  89. UMMONS RETURN
  90. UMMONS RETURN
  91. UMMONS RETURN
  92. UMMONS RETURN
  93. DG: JUDGE EXCUSAL/PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE
  94. NTRY OF APPEARANCE
  95. ury Demand 6 Person/No Fee EF
  106. URY DEMAND 6 PERSON

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more