Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Summit Co

Court

Summit Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-02-17
Type Mandamus
Docket 19 entries
Disposition Judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Gordon, Andrew
Defendant Twinsburg City School District
Photo of Hon. JENNIFER D. TOWELL

Judge

Hon. JENNIFER D. TOWELL

Summit County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT
  2. EXHIBIT A TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  3. EXHIBIT B TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  4. A DISPOSITIVE MOTION, AND A CORRESPONDING EXTENSION OF THE CURRENT BRIEFING SCHEDULED IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MATTER IS HEREBY GRANTED. RELATORS’ BRIEF IN OPPOSITION, IF ANY, IS DUE ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 23, 2024, REGARDLESS OF WHEN RESPONDENT’S DISPOSITIVE MOTION IS FILED. ANY REPLY WILL BE DUE ON OR BEFORE MARCH 8, 2024. JDT
  5. JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
  6. THE PARTIES’ JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE REQUESTING A 21-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL JANUARY 5, 2024, TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MATTER IS HEREBY GRANTED. PURSUANT TO THIS COURT’S ORDER DATED NOVEMBER 7, 2023, RELATORS’ BRIEF IN OPPOSITION, IF ANY, IS DUE ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 19, 2024, REGARDLESS OF WHEN RESPONDENT’S DISPOSITIVE MOTION IS FILED. ANY REPLY WILL BE DUE ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 2, 2024. JT
  7. JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINE
  8. DEFENDANT IS HEREBY GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 15, 2023. PLAINTIFF’S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION, IF ANY, IS DUE ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 19, 2024, REGARDLESS OF WHEN DEFENDANT’S DISPOSITIVE MOTION IS FILED. ANY REPLY WILL BE DUE ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 2, 2024. JDT
  9. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF AFFIDAVIT
  10. A TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED IN THIS MATTER ON NOVEMBER 7, 2023 AT 12:00 P.M. COUNSEL SHALL CALL THE COURT’S CONFERENCE BRIDGE. JDT
  11. A TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED IN THIS MATTER ON OCTOBER 25, 2023 AT 8:30 A.M. COUNSEL SHALL CALL THE COURT’S CONFERENCE BRIDGE. JDT
  12. A TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED IN THIS MATTER ON SEPTEMBER 21, 2023 AT 10:00 A.M. JDT
  13. A TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED IN THIS MATTER ON AUGUST 9, 2023 AT 10:30 A.M. COUNSEL SHALL CALL THE COURT’S CONFERENCE BRIDGE. JDT
  14. A TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE IS SCHEDULED IN THIS MATTER ON JUNE 14, 2023 AT 11:30 A.M. COUNSEL SHALL CALL THE COURT’S CONFERENCE BRIDGE. JDT
  15. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ATTORNEYS SCOTT C. PETERS AND SHERRIE C MASSEY AS COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT TWINSBURG CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
  16. RESPONDENT'S ANSWER TO RELATORS' PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
  17. Certified Mail Service - Served TWINSBURG CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
  18. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL BY Certified Mail TWINSBURG CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
  19. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more