Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-02-13
Status FINAL - FINAL
Type Wm Writ Of Mandamus Cr
Docket 46 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Culbertson, Bill
Defendant Johnson, Darnisa C Evans|Attorney General
Photo of Hon. Elmore Barbara

Judge

Hon. Elmore Barbara

Arkansas County (AR)

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. LOWER COURT INFORMATION
  2. none.
  3. No Images
  4. PARTIAL RECORD LODGED
  5. volume; 753 pages.
  6. No Images
  7. PRO SE PET FOR WRIT MANDAMUS
  8. Petitioner's pro se petition for writ of manndamus.
  9. PETITION
  10. PRO SE PET FOR WRIT MANDAMUS
  11. Petitioner's pro se petition for writ of manndamus.
  12. PETITION
  13. LETTER TO APPELLANT
  14. Acknowledging receipt of both pro se petition for writ of mandamus tendered to the Arkansas Supreme Court on October 4, 2022, and also the petition for writ of mandamus tendered on November 1, 2022.
  15. LETTER
  16. LETTER TO APPELLANT
  17. Acknowledging receipt of pro se motion for appointment of counsel.
  18. LETTER
  19. PRO SE MOT APPOINT OF COUNS
  20. Petitioner's pro se motion for appointment of counsel.
  21. MOTION
  22. LETTER TO APPELLANT
  23. Acknowledging receipt of Petitioner's pro se amended petition for writ of mandamus.
  24. LETTER
  25. AMENDED PETITION
  26. Petitioner's pro se amended petition for writ of mandamus.
  27. PETITION
  28. MOTION SUBMITTED
  29. Petitioner's pro se petition for writ of mandamus.
  30. No Images
  31. MOTION SUBMITTED
  32. Petitioner's pro se petition for writ of mandamus.
  33. No Images
  34. MOTION SUBMITTED
  35. Petitioner's pro se motion for appointment of counsel.
  36. No Images
  37. MOTION SUBMITTED
  38. Petitioner's pro se amended petition for writ of mandamus.
  39. No Images
  40. FORMAL ORDERS - SC
  41. Petitioner's pro se petition for writ of mandamus filed February 13, 2023, is denied. Petitioner's pro se petition for writ of mandamus filed February 13, 2023, is denied. Wood, J., would dismiss. Petitioner's pro se motion for appointment of counsel is moot. Womack and Webb, JJ., would deny. Petitioner's pro se amended petition for writ of mandamus filed March 6, 2023, is dismissed. Wood, J., would dismiss as moot. Webb, J., would deny.
  42. ORDER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more