Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Brazoria County

Court

Brazoria County

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-16
Status Disposed
Type Breach Of Contract
Docket 19 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Citibank N.a.
Defendant Garza, Thomas U
Photo of Hon. Holder, Marc W

Judge

Hon. Holder, Marc W

Brazoria County (TX)

Texas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Satisfaction and Release of Claim
  2. Request Process Request Form
  3. Citation By Private Process Server; Emailed to [email protected]
  4. Citation Requested By Garza, Thomas U GARZA, THOMAS U Served 03/10/2022 Anticipated Server Private Process Server Anticipated Method In Person Serving Method In Person
  5. Answer Defendant's Original Answer
  6. Service Returned Executed 3/10/22
  7. Motion for Default Judgment
  8. Proposed Order for Default Judgment; sent to hearing queue 8-12-22
  9. Docket Entry Answer filed; non jury trial set for 8.15.22 at 9:00 a.m. Clerk to notify.
  10. Notice Clerk's Notice of Hearing
  11. Motion for Continuance
  12. Proposed Order Granting Motion for Continuance; returned unsigned
  13. CANCELED Non-Jury Trial (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Holder, Marc W) Other
  14. Docket Entry Settlement announced. Entry 9/6/22 at 9:00 a.m. mh
  15. Judicial Docket Entry Hearing passed to 10/24/22 at 9:00 a.m. MH
  16. Bailiff's Call Sheet
  17. Notice Clerk's Notice of Hearing; emailed to both attorneys
  18. Stat Closure - Agreed Judgment copy emailed to both attorneys
  19. CANCELED Entry of Judgment (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Holder, Marc W) Case Disposed 09/06/2022 Reset by Court to 10/24/2022

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more