Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-09-15
Type Dissolution Of Marriage, Counterclaim
Docket 89 entries
Disposition dismiss
Photo of Hon. GIBSON, CARL G.

Judge

Hon. GIBSON, CARL G.

Nowata County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PETITION FILED
  2. LAW LIBRARY
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION FEE
  4. OCIS REVOLVING FUND FEE
  5. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  6. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  7. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. 15% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK COURT FUND
  9. COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINT
  10. 10% OF COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINT CC REVOLVING FUND
  11. 15% OF COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINT CC COURT FUND
  12. CO COMMISSIONERS COURTHOUSE SECURITY
  13. 10% OF CO COMMISSIONERS COURTHOUSE SECURITY TO CC REVOLVING
  14. 15% OF CO COMMISSIONERS COURTHOUSE SECURITY TO CC COURT
  15. STATE JUDICIAL, INTERPRETER TRANSLATOR
  16. COURT CLERK'S RECORD MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION FUND
  17. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER FILED
  18. SUMMONS ISSUED
  19. TEMPORARY ORDER (MINUTE) FILED
  20. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED DELAPP / DEFT
  21. AMENDED PETITION FILED
  22. SUMMONS ISSUED
  23. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER FILED
  24. RESPONDENT'S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIM TO PETITIONER'S
  25. PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE FILED
  26. AMENDED APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER. FILED
  27. ORDER SETTING HEARING FILED
  28. ANSWER TO CROSS-PETITION FILED
  29. CASE CALLED ON THE DOCKET FOR PLT'S AMENDED APPLICATION
  30. FOR TEMPORARY ORDER. PLT APPEARS WITH ATTY DALE WARNER
  31. AND DEFT'S ATTY CURTIS DELAPP PRESENT. CASE IS PASSED
  32. TO JUNE 02, 2022 AT 9 AM. ORDER BACK REMINDER NOTE
  33. GIVEN TO THE PLT. GIBSON.AF
  34. RESPONDENT'S ANSWER TO PETITIONER'S AMENDED APPLICATION
  35. FOR TEMPORARY ORDER FILED
  36. AGREED ORDER FILED
  37. CASE CALLED ON THE DOCKET FOR HEARING ON PLT'S AMENDED
  38. APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY ORDER. PLT APPEARS WITH ATTY
  39. DALE WARNER AND DEFT APPEARS WITH ATTY CURTIS DELAPP.
  40. PARTIES WERE SWORN. CASE IS SET FOR TRIAL ON JULY 19,
  41. 2022 AT 9 AM. ORDER BACK SLIPS GIVEN. GIBSON.AF
  42. DEFT'S ATTORNEY CALLED ASKED FOR THE CASE TO BE
  43. STRICKEN TO BE RESET UPON APPLICATION. CI
  44. PETITIONERS APPLICATION FOR INDIRECT CONTEMPT FILED
  45. CITATION FOR CONTEMPT ISSUED
  46. AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING FILED
  47. CASE CALLED ON THE DOCKET FOR PLT'S APPLICATION FOR
  48. CONTEMPT AGAINST THE DEFT. PLT'S ATTY DALE WARNER AND
  49. DEFT APPEARS WITH ATTY CURTIS DELAPP. DEFT SWN, ACKN REC
  50. OF THE CITATION AND P/NG. CASE IS SET FOR HEARING ON
  51. OCTOBER 18, 2022 AT 9 AM. DEFT IS GIVEN AN ORDER BACK
  52. SLIP. GIBSON.AF
  53. DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF CONTEMPT CITATION FILED
  54. CASE IS STRICKEN FROM OCTOBER 18. AF
  55. APPLICATION FOR PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE FILED CI
  56. ORDER SETTING HEARING FILED CI
  57. CASE CALLED ON THE DOCKET FOR PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE. PLT APPEARS WITH ATTY DALE WARNER AND DEFT APPEARS WITH CURTIS DELAPP. PARTIES WERE SWORN AND EXAMINED. CASE IS PASSED TO JUNE 06, 2023 AT 9 AM. ORDER BACK SLIPS GIVEN. GIBSON.AF
  58. CASE CALLED ON DOCKET FOR PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE PLANTIFF AND DEFENDANT PRESENT AND SWORN, PLANTIFF ATTORNEY D. WARNER PRESENT, DEFENDANT ATTORNEY ABSENT AO CASE WAS MOVED TO 07/18/23 AT 9AM. ORDER BACK SLIPS GIVEN
  59. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER. FILED CI
  60. NOTICE OF SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM. FILED CI
  61. CASE ALLED ON THE DOCKET FOR PRE TRIAL CONFERENCE. PLT APPEARS WITH ATTY DALE WARNER AND DEFT APPEARS WITH ATTY CURTIS DELAPP. CASE IS SET FOR TRIAL ON SEPTEMBER 26 AT 9 AM. COURT ADOPTS THE AGREEMENT AS THIS COURT'S ORDER. GIBSON.AF
  62. SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM FILED
  63. ATTORNEY'S AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE FILED
  64. CASE CALLED ON THE DOCKET FOR TRIAL. PLT APPEARS WITH ATTY DALE WARNER AND DEFT APPEARS WITH ATTY TODD CONE (APPEARING FOR ATTY CURTIS DELAPP). PARTIES WERE SWORN. MR. DELAPP IS UNABLE TO BE PRESENT. CASE IS PASSED TO DECEMBER 06, 2023 AT 9 AM. GIBSON.AF
  65. CASE IS RESET FOR TRIAL TO JANUARY 23, 2024 AT 9 AM. BOTH ATTYS HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED. AF
  66. CASE APPEARS ON THE DOCKET FOR TRIAL. CASE IS PASSED AT THE REQUEST OF ATTY CURTIS DELAPP WITHOUT OBJECTION. AGREED DATE IS MARCH 05, 2024 AT 9 AM. GIBSON.AF
  67. CASE CALLED ON THE DOCKET FOR TRIAL. CASE PASSED BY AGREEMENT TO MAY 7, 2024 AT 9AM. GIBSON/DWS
  68. APPLICATION FOR CONTEMP CITATION. FILED
  69. CITATION FOR CONTEMPT. FILED
  70. CASE PASSED PER AGREEMENT TO MAY 7, 2024. NEITHER PARTY OR ATTY'S WERE PRESENT.
  71. CASE CALLED ON THE DOCKET FOR NON-JURY TRIAL AND DEFT'S P/NG TO CITATION FOR CONTEMPT. PLT APPEARS WITH ATTY DALE WARNER AND DEFT APPEARS WITH ATTY CURTIS DELAPP. PARTIES SWORN AND EXAMINED. PLT ENTERS EXHIBITS 1 THRU 47 THAT WERE ENTERED. PLT EXAMINED. DEFT EXAMINED. DEFT P/NG TO THE CONTEMPT. COURT SUSTAINS THE PETITION FOR DIVORCE. THE PARTIES ARE GRANTED A DIVORCE ON THE GROUNDS OF INCOMPATIBILITY. COURT ADOPTS PLT'S EXHIBIT #28 MODIFIED AND ADJUSTS $50,000 LESS IN EACH COLUMN. PLT IS AWARDED ITEMS IN PLT'S POSSESSION, 2016 CADILLAC SUBJECT TO ITS DEBT, ITEMS (COLLECTABILES IN THE SEA CONTAINER, HER 401 (K), $37,970 ALIMONY CONTAINED IN THE JUDGMENT. COURT SUSTAINS THE $2,000 LOT RENT. COURT SUSTAINS THE CONTEMPT AND PASSES SENTENCING WITH THE DISTRIBUTION OF ASSETS. DEFT IS AWARDED ALL THE PROPERTY LISTED IN THE PROPOSED DIVISION OF MARTIAL ASSETS. COURT AWARDS REASONABLE ATTORNEY FEES TO THE PLT FOR THE PROSECUTION OF THE DIVORCE AND THE CONTEMPT CITATION, TO BE SUPPLIED WITH AN APPLICATION BY MR. WARNER. GIBSON.LISA WARD.AF
  72. COURT REPORTER FEE
  73. NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT (ORIGINAL ONLY) FILED
  74. APPLICATION FOR HEARING TO SETTLE JOURNAL ENTRY. FILED
  75. NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT. FILED
  76. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDING TRIAL ON THE MERITS HAD MAY 7, 2024 BEFORE THE HONORABLE CARIL G. GIBSON ASSOCIATE DISTRICT JUDGE. 1 ORIGINAL & 1 COPY. FILED
  77. ORDER SETTING HEARING FILED
  78. CASE CALLED ON THE DOCKET FOR PLT'S APPLICATION TO SETTLE JOURNAL ENTRY. PLT APPEARS WITH ATTY DALE WARNER AND DEFT APPEARS WITH ATTY CURTIS DELAPP. APPLICATION IS SUTAINED. GIBSON.AF
  79. DECREE OF DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE. FILED
  80. PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY FEE APPLICATION. FILED
  81. CERTIFIED DOCKET SHEET
  82. PETITION IN ERROR FILED
  83. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  84. CERTIFICATE OF APPEAL FILED
  85. RESPONSE TO PETITION IN ERROR. FILED JW
  86. DESIGNATION OF RECORD FOR APPEAL FROM DISTRICT COURT. FILED.
  87. AMENDED PETITION IN ERROR. FILED.
  88. RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS. FILED
  89. DESIGNATION OF RECORD FOR APPEAL FROM DISTRICT COURT. FILED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more