Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Orange Co

Court

Orange Co

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-10-18
Type Asset Forfeiture
Docket 23 entries
Disposition without prejudice

Parties

Plaintiff People Of The State Of California
Defendant Quan Hong Vo|The People Of The State Of California
Photo of Hon. Supervising On

Judge

Hon. Supervising On

Orange Co

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. MINUTES FINALIZED FOR STATUS CONFERENCE 06/05/2023 09:30:00 AM.
  2. COURT ORDERS THE ENTIRE ACTION DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
  3. STIPULATION AND ORDER (FOR FORFEITURE) FILED BY PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON 06/05/2023
  4. E-FILING TRANSACTION 11148507 RECEIVED ON 05/30/2023 01:52:40 PM.
  5. STATUS CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 06/05/2023 AT 09:30:00 AM IN C12 AT CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER.
  6. NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE FILED BY PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON 04/11/2023
  7. E-FILING TRANSACTION 21297701 RECEIVED ON 04/11/2023 02:21:56 PM.
  8. MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES SCHEDULED FOR 06/22/2023 AT 02:00:00 PM IN C12 AT CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER.
  9. MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO FORM INTERROGATORIES SCHEDULED FOR 06/22/2023 AT 02:00:00 PM IN C12 AT CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER.
  10. MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES FILED BY PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON 04/14/2023
  11. MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES FILED BY PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON 04/14/2023
  12. E-FILING TRANSACTION 21299201 RECEIVED ON 04/14/2023 09:28:05 AM.
  13. CASE CONSOLIDATED ON 01/13/2023. 30-2022-01287546-CU-AF-CJC IS DESIGNATED THE LEAD CASE.
  14. PETITION - NEW CASE INITIATION (FOR FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY) FILED BY PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON 12/02/2022
  15. MINUTES FINALIZED FOR STATUS CONFERENCE 01/09/2023 09:30:00 AM.
  16. STATUS CONFERENCE CONTINUED TO 04/24/2023 AT 09:30 AM IN THIS DEPARTMENT PURSUANT TO PARTY'S MOTION.
  17. THE COURT ORDERS THE FOLLOWING CASES CONSOLIDATED FOR ALL PURPOSES: 30-2022-01287546 CLAIM OF VO AND 30-2022-01295292 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. $41,829.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY. THE COURT DESIGNATES 30-2022-01287546 CLAIM OF VO AS THE LEAD CASE AND ALL FURTHER DOCUMENTS MUST BE FILED UNDER THE CASE NUMBER AND CAPTION OF THE LEAD CASE.
  18. RELATED CASES INCLUDE: 30-2022-01295292 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VS. $41,829.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY..
  19. NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE OC GENERATED
  20. STATUS CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/09/2023 AT 09:30:00 AM IN C12 AT CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER.
  21. STATUS CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 11/24/2022 AT 02:00:00 PM IN C12 AT CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER.
  22. CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDICIAL OFFICER SUPERVISING ON 10/18/2022.
  23. CLAIM OPPOSING FORFEITURE > 5000 FILED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON 10/18/2022

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more