Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Alaska Unified

Court

Alaska Unified

Alaska

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-05-10
Status Closed
Type Divorce Without Children (1 Ke)|Spouses Without Minor Children (not Pregnant) Do Not Agree On All Issues To End Marriage
Docket 39 entries
Disposition transfer

Parties

Plaintiff Jasper, Carstens
Defendant Shaughnessy, Patricia
Photo of Hon. Lybrand Katherine H

Judge

Hon. Lybrand Katherine H

Juneau Borough (AK)

Alaska

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Initial Judicial Assignment: Honorable Trevor Stephens
  2. Complaint for Legal Separation Receipt: 1964892 Date: 05/10/2022
  3. Domestic Relations Procedural Order and Assignment
  4. Summons and Notice to Both Parties of Judicial Assignment
  5. Information Sheet - Confidential Document per Civil Rule 90.1(f)(1)
  6. Attorney Information Attorney Currall, Nathaniel S representing Plaintiff Jasper, Carstens as of 05/10/2022
  7. Administrative Reassignment from Judge Trevor Stephens to Not Assigned 1KE02.
  8. Entry of Appearance Attorney: Zuanich, Brian Christopher (1512129) Attorney: Zuanich, Robert P (0605032) Patricia Shaughnessy (Defendant);
  9. Attorney Information Attorney Zuanich, Robert P representing Defendant Shaughnessy, Patricia as of 06/13/2022
  10. Attorney Information Attorney Zuanich, Brian Christopher representing Defendant Shaughnessy, Patricia as of 06/13/2022
  11. Answer and Counterclaim Attorney: Zuanich, Brian Christopher (1512129) Patricia Shaughnessy (Defendant);
  12. Administrative Reassignment from Judge Not Assigned 1KE02 to Judge Katherine H Lybrand
  13. Answer to Counterclaim for Dissolution Pursuant to AS25.24.200 Attorney: Currall, Nathaniel S (0407042) Carstens Jasper (Plaintiff);
  14. Motion for Protective Order Attorney: Zuanich, Brian Christopher (1512129) Patricia Shaughnessy (Defendant); Filing Party: Shaughnessy, Patricia Case Motion #1
  15. Order Re: Motion for Protective Order
  16. Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion for Protective Order: Request for Oral Argument and/or Evidentiary Hearing Attorney: Currall, Nathaniel S (0407042) Carstens Jasper (Plaintiff); Case Motion #1: Motion for Protective Order
  17. Objections to Evidence in Support of Motion for Protective Order Attorney: Currall, Nathaniel S (0407042)
  18. Order for Evidentiary Hearing
  19. Updated Civil Pretrial Order
  20. Motion for Expedited Consideration to Attend by Remote Video on 11/4/22 Attorney: Zuanich, Brian Christopher (1512129) Patricia Shaughnessy (Defendant); Filing Party: Shaughnessy, Patricia Case Motion #2
  21. Motion to Attend by Remote Video Attorney: Zuanich, Brian Christopher (1512129) Patricia Shaughnessy (Defendant); Filing Party: Shaughnessy, Patricia Case Motion #3
  22. Order Granting Motion Shaughnessy, Patricia Case Motion #2 - Motion for Expedited Consideration to Attend by Remote Video on 11/4/22
  23. PROOF OF SERVICE
  24. Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion for Remote Attendance at Evidentiary Hearing Attorney: Currall, Nathaniel S (0407042) Carstens Jasper (Plaintiff); Case Motion #3: Motion to Attend by Remote Video
  25. Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Remote Attendance for Evidentiary Hearing Attorney: Zuanich, Robert P (0605032) Patricia Shaughnessy (Defendant); Case Motion #3: Motion to Attend by Remote Video
  26. Order Denying Motion -Shaughnessy, Patricia Case Motion #3 - Motion to Attend by Remote Video
  27. Motion for Reconsideration Attorney: Zuanich, Robert P (0605032) Patricia Shaughnessy (Defendant); Filing Party: Shaughnessy, Patricia Case Motion #4
  28. Order Denying Motion on Record - Shaughnessy, Patricia Case Motion #4 - Motion for Reconsideration
  29. PROOF OF SERVICE
  30. Order of Continuance
  31. Order Deferring Ruling on Motion for Protective Order Until December 20, 2022
  32. Motion Deemed Moot - Shaughnessy, Patricia Case Motion #1 - Motion for Protective Order
  33. Defendant's Proposed Additional Findings of Fact Attorney: Zuanich, Robert P (0605032) Patricia Shaughnessy (Defendant);
  34. Divorce Decree Granted
  35. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Divorce with Property and No Children)
  36. Divorce Granted After Contested Hearing
  37. Order to File Vital Statistics Form (VS-401)
  38. Second Order to File Vital Statistics Form (VS401)
  39. LODGED: VS-401 Certificate of Absolute Divorce or Dissolution

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more