Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Orange Co

Court

Orange Co

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-29
Type Medical Malpractice
Docket 19 entries
Disposition dismissal without prejudice

Parties

Plaintiff Cindy Wier|Gerald Edwin Wier
Defendant Jordan Davies|Regents Of The University Of Californi|Shuichi Suzuki|The Regents Of The University Of Calif
Photo of Hon. Hurwitz Lon F

Judge

Hon. Hurwitz Lon F

Orange County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. E-FILING TRANSACTION 31199917 RECEIVED ON 08/29/2022 11:03:29 AM.
  2. REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE - ENTIRE ACTION FILED BY WIER, GERALD EDWIN ON 01/20/2023
  3. E-FILING TRANSACTION 21262101 RECEIVED ON 01/20/2023 05:20:23 PM.
  4. CASE DISMISSED WITH DISPOSITION OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL
  5. COMPLAINT DISPOSED WITH DISPOSITION OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL.
  6. E-FILING TRANSACTION NUMBER 31254296 REJECTED.
  7. E-FILING TRANSACTION NUMBER 31241777 REJECTED.
  8. PAYMENT RECEIVED BY ONELEGAL FOR 209 - ADVANCED JURY FEE (NON-REFUNDABLE) IN THE AMOUNT OF 150.00, TRANSACTION NUMBER 13137385 AND RECEIPT NUMBER 12965473.
  9. NOTICE OF POSTING JURY FEES FILED BY DAVIES, JORDAN; SUZUKI, SHUICHI; THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ON 11/10/2022
  10. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FILED BY DAVIES, JORDAN; SUZUKI, SHUICHI; THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA ON 11/10/2022
  11. E-FILING TRANSACTION 31231505 RECEIVED ON 11/10/2022 04:52:05 PM.
  12. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE REASSIGNED TO C20 AT CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ON 01/31/2023 AT 09:00:00 AM.
  13. CASE REASSIGNED TO ERICK LARSH EFFECTIVE 11/01/2022.
  14. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 01/31/2023 AT 09:00:00 AM IN C20 AT CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER.
  15. CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDICIAL OFFICER HURWITZ, LON ON 08/29/2022.
  16. PAYMENT RECEIVED BY LEGALCONNECT FOR 194 - COMPLAINT OR OTHER 1ST PAPER IN THE AMOUNT OF 435.00, TRANSACTION NUMBER 13098320 AND RECEIPT NUMBER 12926322.
  17. CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED BY WIER, GERALD EDWIN; WIER, CINDY ON 08/29/2022
  18. SUMMONS ISSUED AND FILED FILED BY WIER, GERALD EDWIN; WIER, CINDY ON 08/29/2022
  19. COMPLAINT FILED BY WIER, GERALD EDWIN; WIER, CINDY ON 08/29/2022

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more