Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Dallas County Civil

Court

Dallas County Civil

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-06-15
Status CLOSED
Type Cntr Cnsmr Com Debt
Docket 33 entries
Disposition Default judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, Na
Defendant Che, Marinus C
Photo of Hon. Williams Kristina M

Judge

Hon. Williams Kristina M

Dallas County (TX)

Texas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. 06/15/2022 NEW CASE FILED (OCA) - CIVIL
  2. 06/15/2022 ORIGINAL PETITION View Document ORIGINAL PETITION
  3. 06/15/2022 CORRESPONDENCE - LETTER TO FILE View Document REQUEST FOR SERVICE Comment REQUEST FOR SERVICE
  4. 06/15/2022 ISSUE CITATION View Document ISSUE CITATION - MARINUS C CHE
  5. 07/06/2022 CITATION Served 08/04/2022 Anticipated Server ESERVE Anticipated Method Actual Server PRIVATE PROCESS SERVER Returned 08/08/2022 Comment MARINUS C CHE
  6. 08/08/2022 RETURN OF SERVICE View Document EXECUTED CITATION - MARINUS C CHE Comment EXECUTED CITATION - MARINUS C CHE
  7. 10/12/2022 MOTION - MISCELLANOUS View Document MOTION EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS-PLAINTIFF Comment EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS
  8. 10/12/2022 NON-SIGNED PROPOSED ORDER/JUDGMENT View Document PROPOSED ORDER - PLAINTIFF EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS Comment PROPOSED PLAINTIFF EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS
  9. 10/17/2022 ORDER - LEAVE View Document UNOPPOSED EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS Comment - EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS / EXHIBITS / MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  10. 10/19/2022 MOTION - RETAIN View Document MOTION TO RETAIN
  11. 10/19/2022 NON-SIGNED PROPOSED ORDER/JUDGMENT View Document PROPOSED ORDER TO RETAIN Comment PROPOSED ORDER TO RETAIN
  12. 10/24/2022 DISMISSAL FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION View Document 192 DWOPNO ACTION Notice Hearing Time 9:00 AM Cancel Reason REQUESTED BY ATTORNEY/PRO SE
  13. 10/24/2022 ORDER - RETAIN CASE ON DOCKET View Document ORDER TO RETAIN
  14. 11/09/2022 MOTION - DEFAULT JUDGMENT View Document MOTION DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  15. 11/09/2022 NON-SIGNED PROPOSED ORDER/JUDGMENT View Document PROPOSED ORDER DEFAULT JUDMGENT Comment PROPOSED DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  16. 11/18/2022 MOTION - RETAIN View Document MOTION RETAIN
  17. 11/18/2022 NON-SIGNED PROPOSED ORDER/JUDGMENT View Document PROPOSED ORDER RETAIN Comment PROPOSED RETAIN
  18. 11/21/2022 DISMISSAL FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION View Document 192 DWOPNO ACTION Notice Hearing Time 9:00 AM Cancel Reason REQUESTED BY ATTORNEY/PRO SE
  19. 11/21/2022 Motion - Default Judgment View Document MOTION DEFAULT JUDGMENT View Document DEFAULT JUDMGENT Judicial Officer HURDLE, RONALD Hearing Time 09:30 AM Cancel Reason BY COURT ADMINISTRATOR Comment Motion Default Judgment - Submission Docket
  20. 11/22/2022 ORDER - RETAIN CASE ON DOCKET View Document RETAIN CASE ON DOCKET
  21. 11/30/2022 NOTICE OF JUDGMENT MAILED View Document FP NOTICE OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT RULE 239(a) View Document FP NOTICE OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT RULE 239(a) Comment (2) - ALL PARTIES

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more