Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Orange Co

Court

Orange Co

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-12-28
Type Civil Rights
Docket 47 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Walter Mitchell
Defendant Westminster Teak, Inc.
Photo of Hon. Slaughter, Fred

Judge

Hon. Slaughter, Fred

Orange County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - ENTIRE ACTION FILED BY MITCHELL, WALTER ON 06/14/2022
  2. E-FILING TRANSACTION 21171352 RECEIVED ON 06/14/2022 04:35:56 PM.
  3. CASE DISMISSED WITH DISPOSITION OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL
  4. COMPLAINT DISPOSED WITH DISPOSITION OF REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL.
  5. MINUTES FINALIZED FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 05/31/2022 09:00:00 AM.
  6. THE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL ON SETTLED CASE IS SCHEDULED FOR 08/02/2022 AT 09:00 AM IN DEPARTMENT N16.
  7. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL ON SETTLED CASE SCHEDULED FOR 08/02/2022 AT 09:00:00 AM IN N16 AT NORTH JUSTICE CENTER.
  8. NOTICE OF REMOTE APPEARANCE FILED BY WESTMINSTER TEAK, INC. ON 05/26/2022
  9. E-FILING TRANSACTION 21164424 RECEIVED ON 05/26/2022 05:03:30 PM.
  10. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT FILED BY WESTMINSTER TEAK, INC. ON 05/26/2022
  11. E-FILING TRANSACTION 31161817 RECEIVED ON 05/26/2022 01:41:28 PM.
  12. PAYMENT RECEIVED BY ONELEGAL FOR 37 - STIPULATION AND ORDER IN THE AMOUNT OF 20.00, TRANSACTION NUMBER 13051432 AND RECEIPT NUMBER 12879448.
  13. STIPULATION AND ORDER FILED BY WESTMINSTER TEAK, INC. ON 05/18/2022
  14. E-FILING TRANSACTION 41335953 RECEIVED ON 05/17/2022 05:41:21 PM.
  15. PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER RECEIVED ON 05/17/2022
  16. PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER RECEIVED ON 05/17/2022
  17. PROOF OF ESERVICE FILED BY WESTMINSTER TEAK, INC. ON 05/17/2022
  18. E-FILING TRANSACTION 1989781 RECEIVED ON 05/17/2022 05:41:19 PM.
  19. CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT FILED BY MITCHELL, WALTER ON 05/11/2022
  20. E-FILING TRANSACTION 31155582 RECEIVED ON 05/11/2022 01:58:32 PM.
  21. CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF MAILING/ELECTRONIC SERVICE
  22. MINUTES FINALIZED FOR CHAMBERS WORK 05/04/2022 10:09:00 AM.
  23. THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CURRENTLY SET ON 06/01/2022 IS ORDERED ADVANCED TO 05/31/2022 AT 09:00 AM IN .
  24. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 05/31/2022 AT 09:00:00 AM IN N16 AT NORTH JUSTICE CENTER.
  25. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE REASSIGNED TO N16 AT NORTH JUSTICE CENTER ON 06/01/2022 AT 02:00:00 PM.
  26. PROOF OF ESERVICE FILED BY WESTMINSTER TEAK, INC. ON 04/20/2022
  27. E-FILING TRANSACTION 31147026 RECEIVED ON 04/20/2022 06:01:41 PM.
  28. PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER RECEIVED ON 04/20/2022
  29. CASE REASSIGNED TO DONALD GAFFNEY EFFECTIVE 04/22/2022.
  30. PAYMENT RECEIVED BY ONELEGAL FOR 37 - STIPULATION AND ORDER IN THE AMOUNT OF 20.00, TRANSACTION NUMBER 13027941 AND RECEIPT NUMBER 12855922.
  31. STIPULATION AND ORDER FILED BY WESTMINSTER TEAK, INC. ON 03/25/2022
  32. E-FILING TRANSACTION 41312861 RECEIVED ON 03/22/2022 04:33:57 PM.
  33. PROOF OF ESERVICE FILED BY WESTMINSTER TEAK, INC. ON 03/22/2022
  34. E-FILING TRANSACTION 31134835 RECEIVED ON 03/22/2022 04:33:56 PM.
  35. PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER RECEIVED ON 03/22/2022
  36. PAYMENT RECEIVED BY ONELEGAL FOR 195 - ANSWER OR OTHER 1ST PAPER IN THE AMOUNT OF 435.00, TRANSACTION NUMBER 13024036 AND RECEIPT NUMBER 12852006.
  37. PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER (NOT SIGNED) FILED BY WESTMINSTER TEAK, INC. ON 03/22/2022
  38. E-FILING TRANSACTION 41298361 RECEIVED ON 02/15/2022 10:19:17 AM.
  39. PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER RECEIVED ON 02/15/2022
  40. PROOF OF ESERVICE FILED BY WESTMINSTER TEAK, INC. ON 02/15/2022
  41. E-FILING TRANSACTION 1952060 RECEIVED ON 02/15/2022 10:19:16 AM.
  42. CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 06/01/2022 AT 02:00:00 PM IN N15 AT NORTH JUSTICE CENTER.
  43. CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDICIAL OFFICER SLAUGHTER, FRED ON 12/28/2021.
  44. PAYMENT RECEIVED BY LEGALCONNECT FOR 194 - COMPLAINT OR OTHER 1ST PAPER IN THE AMOUNT OF 435.00, TRANSACTION NUMBER 12988417 AND RECEIPT NUMBER 12816356.
  45. SUMMONS ISSUED AND FILED FILED BY MITCHELL, WALTER ON 12/28/2021
  46. CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET FILED BY MITCHELL, WALTER ON 12/28/2021
  47. COMPLAINT FILED BY MITCHELL, WALTER ON 12/28/2021

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more