Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-10-27
Type Criminal
Docket 20 entries

Parties

Plaintiff State Of Ohio
Defendant Haq, Samir
Photo of Hon. Betleski Judge Mark

Judge

Hon. Betleski Judge Mark

Lorain County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INDICTMENT FILED. WARRANT TO ARREST W/COPY OF INDICTMENT ISSUED TO LORAIN COUNTY SHERIFF. INDICTMENT FOR COUNT 1: VIOLATION OF CASINO GAMLBING LAWS, 3772.99(E)(12) - F5 W/SPEC COUNT 2: VIOLATION OF CASINO GAMLBING LAWS, 3772.99(E)(12) - F5 W/SPEC COUNT 3: VIOLATION OF CASINO GAMLBING LAWS, 3772.99(E)(12) - F5 W/SPEC COUNT 4: VIOLATION OF CASINO GAMLBING LAWS, 3772.99(E)(12) - F5 W/SPEC
  2. BOND POSTED: $5,000 PERSONAL BOND POSTED BY DEFT
  3. WARRANT TO DISCHARGE ISSUED TO LORAIN COUNTY SHERIFF
  4. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED.
  5. SHERIFF'S RETURN - I ARRESTED DEFENDANT ON: 12/6/2022 PHIL R. STAMMITTI, SHERIFF
  6. BOND IS HEREBY SET AT $5,000 PERSONAL RECOGNIZANCE BOND; AND $0 CASH BOND; PROVIDED FURTHER THAT AS AN ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT OF BOND, DEFENDANT SHALL SUBMIT TO A DNA SPECIMEN COLLECTION PROCEDURE PURSUANT TO O.R.C. 2901.07 AND SHALL NOT BE RELEASED ON BOND UNTIL A SUITABLE DNA SPECIMEN HAS BEEN COLLECTED. SEE JRNL.
  7. DEFENDANT ARRAIGNED. WAIVED TIME AND MANNER OF SERVICE. WAIVED READING OF INDICTMENT. ENTERED PLEA OF NOT GUILTY. BOND CONT'D. BY WAIVER. CASE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE BETLESKI. DEFT HAS RETAINED ATTY ALI MUSTAFA
  8. STATE'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY FILED.
  9. BILL OF PARTICULARS FILED BY THE STATE.
  10. STATE OF OHIO'S CERTIFICATION OF NONDISCLOSURE OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS FILED.
  11. DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY FILED BY THE STATE.
  12. PLEA OF GUILTY, WAIVER OF RIGHTS FILED. AMENDED INDICTMENT
  13. DEFENDANT IN COURT WITH COUNSEL; WITHDRAWS FORMER PLEA OF NOT GUILTY AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL AND ENTERS A PLEA OF GUILTY TO: THE AMENDED INDICTMENT WHICH PLEA IS ACCEPTED. THE COURT HEREBY FINDS THE DEFENDANT GUILTY. COURT PROCEEDED IMMEDIATELY TO SENTENCING. SEE JRNL.
  14. DEFT APPEARED IN COURT FOR SENTENCING AFTER HAVING PLEAD GUILTY TO AND BEEN FOUND GUILTY BY THE COURT OF THE FOLLOWING CHARGES: COUNT 1: GAMBLING, 2915.02(A)(2)- M1 COUNT 2: GAMBLING, 2915.02(A)(2)- M1 COUNT 3: GAMBLING, 2915.02(A)(2)- M1 COUNT 4: GAMBLING, 2915.02(A)(2)- M1 DEFT SENTENCED TO: COUNT 1: 180 DAYS IN JAIL COUNT 2: 180 DAYS IN JAIL COUNT 3: 180 DAYS IN JAIL COUNT 4: 180 DAYS IN JAIL THESE SENTENCES ARE SUSPENDED UPON THE CONDITION OF GOOD BEHAVIOR FOR 1 YEAR. SANCTIONS: DEFT TO PAY ALL COSTS OF PROSECUTION. SEE JOURNAL.
  15. PURSUANT TO THE PLEA AND SENTENCE AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, R.C. 2981.04. DEFT'S PLEA AND THE COURT'S SENTENCE, THE $23,361.00 IN PROCEEDS IS ORDERED FORFEITED TO THE STATE OF OHIO AND SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO LAW ENFORCEMENT TRUST ACCOUNT: 50% TO THE OHIO CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION AND 50% TO THE LORAIN COUNTY PROSECUTIOR'S OFFICE. EACH AGENCY SHALL SHARE THE YEARLY STATUTORY PERCENTAGE OF PROCEEDS FOR COMMUNITY PREVENTIVE EDUCATION PURSUANT TO R.C. 2981.13(D). ALSO PURSUANT TO THE PLEA AND SENTENCE AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, R.C. 2981.04, DEFT'S PLEA, THE COURT'S SENTENCE, THE 69 ELECTRONIC DEVICES OR COMPONENTS SEIZED ON 12/8/2021 ARE FORFEITED TO THE OHIO CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION TO BE DISPOSED OF PURSUANT TO THEIR EVIDENTIARY CONTROL OR DESTROYED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  16. ITEMIZED BILL SENT TO DEFENDANT.
  17. CASE DISPOSITION REPORT SENT TO OHIO B.C.I.
  18. ON A PREVIOUS DAY AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE DEFENDANT'S PLEA AND SENTENCING ON DECEMBER 27, 2022, THE COURT ORDERED THE PROCEEDS OF THE OFFENSE TO BE DISTRIBUTED EQUALLY TO THE LORAIN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE AND THE CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION. HAVING BEEN ADVISED BY THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE THAT THE PROPOSED ENTRY SUBMITTED INADVERTENTLY FAILED TO INCLUDE A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY IN THE INVESTIGATION OF THE OFFENSE, THE COURT NOW MAKES FURTHER PROVISIONS FOR THE DISPOSITION OF THE FUNDS SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE. AT THE REQUEST OF THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, AND PURSUANT TO THE PLEA AND SENTENCE AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, R.C. 2981.04, DEFENDANT'S PLEA AND THE COURT'S PREVOUSLY-IMPOSED SENTENCE, THE $23,361.00 IN PROCEEDS IS HEREBY ORDERED FORFEITED TO THE STATE OF OHIO AND SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT TRUST ACCOUNTS OF THE AGENCIES INVOLVED IN EQUAL PARTS: 33% TO THE OHIO CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION ($7,787.00), 33% TO THE LORAIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE ($7,787.00), AND 33% TO THE LORAIN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE ($7,787.00). EACH AGENCY SHALL SHARE THE YEARLY STATUTORY PERCENTAGE OF PROCEEDS FOR COMMUNITY PREVENTIVE EDUCATION PURSUANT TO R.C. 2981.13(D). ALSO PURSUANT TO THE PLEA AND SENTENCE AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, R.C. 2981.04, DEFENDANT'S PLEA, AND THE COURT'S SENTENCE, THE 69 ELECTRONIC DEVICES OR COMPONENTS SEIZED ON DECEMBER 8, 2021 ARE FORFEITED TO THE OHIO CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION TO BE DISPOSED OF PURSUANT TO THEIR EVIDENTIARY CONTROL POLICIES OR OTHERWISE DESTROYED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  19. IN PREVIOUS ENTRIES THE COURT ORDERED FORFEITURE AND SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED THE ENTITIES TO WHICH THE FORFEITURE WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED. THE AMOUNT OF THE FORFEITURE PREVIOUSLY ORDERED WAS $23,361.00. DURING THE INVESTIGATION, THE STATE AGREED TO RETURN THE FUNDS SEIZED OUT OF THE ATM TO THE ATM SERVICER AS THOSE FUNDS WERE NOT TRACEABLE AS PROCEEDS OF THE OFFENSE AND PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OF THOSE FUNDS WAS ESTABLISHED. THE AMOUNT OF UNITED STATES CURRENCY ACTUALLY SEIZED MINUS THE AMOUNT RETURNED TO THE ATM SERVICER WAS $19,157.00. AT THE REQUEST OF THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, AND PURSUANT TO THE PLEA AND SENTENCE AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES, R.C. 2981.04, DEFENDANT'S PLEA, AND THE COURT'S PREVIOUSLY-IMPOSED SENTENCE, THE $19,157.00 IN FORFEITED PROCEEDS TO THE STATE IS HEREBY ORDERED FORFEITED TO THE STATE OF OHIO AND SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO LAW ENFORCEMENT TRUST ACCOUNTS OF THE AGENCIES INVOLVED IN EQUAL PARTS: 33% TO THE OHIO CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION; 33% TO THE LORAIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, AND 33% TO THE LORAIN COUNTY PROSECUTOR. EACH AGENCY SHALL SHARE THE YERALY STATUTORY PERCENTAGE OF PROCEEDS FOR COMMUNITY PREVENTIVE EDUCATION PURSUANT TO R.C. 2981.13(D). ALSO PURSUANT TO THE PLE AND SENTENCE AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES AND R.C. 2981.04, DEFENDANT'S PLEA, AND THE COURT'S PREVIOUSLY-IMPOSED SENTENCE, THE 69 ELECTRONIC DEVICES OR COMPONENTS SEIZED ON DECEMBER 8, 2021 ARE FORFEITED TO THE OHIO CASINO CONTROL COMMISSION TO BE DISPOSED OF PURSUANT TO THEIR EVIDENTIARY CONTROL POLICIES OR OTHERWISE DESTROYED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
  20. A/R AGING START DATE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.