Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Minnesota Supreme Court

Court

Minnesota Supreme Court

Minnesota

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-01-30
Status Closed
Type Standard Criminal 1 St Deg. Murder Direct
Docket 46 entries

Docket Entries

  1. otice - Appeal - Case Filed - 10/31/22 Judgment
  2. udgment - Non-costs
  3. pinion - Published
  4. otice - Opinion Release Imminent
  5. otice - Attorney Substitution - Peter Marker for Jeffrey Wald o/b/o Respondent
  6. vent - Oral - En Banc
  7. otice - Counsel Arguing Cases - Jeffrey Wald for Respondent
  8. otice - Counsel Arguing Cases - Jennifer Workman Jesness for Appellant
  9. vent - Oral En Banc - scheduled December 13, 2023
  10. otice - *AMENDED** Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Jeffrey Wald
  11. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Jeffrey Wald o/b/o State of Minnesota
  12. otice - **AMENDED** Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Jennifer Workman Jesness
  13. rief - Reply E-Filed
  14. rief - Respondent E-Filed
  15. vent - Orig. Court Exhibits Returned
  16. rder - Grant - Respondent's brief due 10/6/23
  17. otion - Extension of Time - Respondent Brief
  18. vent - Electronic Record Submitted/Received + MNCIS + MNDES +C-Track
  19. otice - Attorney Scheduling Conflicts - Jennifer Workman Jesness
  20. otice - Request Trial Court/Agency File
  21. rief - Appellant E-Filed
  22. tatement - Case - Appellant
  23. ranscript - Delivery Certificate - CR Hoglin
  24. rder - Remedy Deficiencies -CR Hoglin Shall File a Transcript Certificate by 5/23/23
  25. mended Transcript - Delivery Certificate - Michelle Clifton
  26. ranscript - Delivery Certificate - Michelle Clifton
  27. ranscript - Delivery Certificate - Elizabeth Tremmel
  28. ranscript - Delivery Certificate - Patricia Kinning
  29. ranscript - Delivery Certificate - Alicia Lopez
  30. ther - Docket Notation - Rejected Transcript Delivery Certificate - Counsel Missing
  31. ranscript - Delivery Certificate - Emelia Shenkir-Mullen
  32. ranscript - Delivery Certificate - Emily Hutcheson
  33. ranscript - Acceptance of SPDO Order - Emelia Shenkir-Mullen
  34. ranscript - Acceptance of SPDO Order - Patricia Kinning
  35. ranscript - Acceptance of SPDO Order - Michelle Clifton
  36. ranscript - Acceptance of SPDO Order - Emily Hutcheson
  37. ranscript - Initial Certificate- Alicia Lopez
  38. ranscript - Acceptance of SPDO Order - Elizabeth Tremmel
  39. ranscript - Order for - Patricia Kinning
  40. ranscript - Order for - Elizabeth Tremmel
  41. ranscript - Order for - Alicia Lopez
  42. ranscript - Order for - Emily Hutcheson
  43. ranscript - Order for - Michelle Clifton
  44. ranscript - Order for - Kate Hoglin
  45. ranscript - Order for - Emelia Shenkir-Mullen
  46. otice - Case Filing

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more