Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Las Cruces

Court

Las Cruces

New Mexico

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-10-03
Status CLS: JUDGMENT/ DISPOSITION
Type Declaratory Relief
Docket 94 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Buhl Hamm Joshua Miracle
Defendant Good Earth Real Estate Llc
Photo of Hon. De Laney, Jennifer E.

Judge

Hon. De Laney, Jennifer E.

Dona Ana County (NM)

New Mexico

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. LS: STIPULATED DISMISSAL
  2. OURT MINUTE/PROCEEDINGS
  3. TC: HEARING (STATUS)
  4. DG: NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT
  5. DG: SUPREME COURT ORDER DESIGNATING JUDGE
  6. DG: JUDGE RECUSAL
  7. DG: NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT
  8. DG: JUDGE RECUSAL
  9. DG: NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT
  10. DG: JUDGE RECUSAL
  11. DG: NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT
  12. DG: JUDGE RECUSAL
  13. DG: NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT
  14. DG: JUDGE RECUSAL
  15. DG: NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT
  16. DG: JUDGE RECUSAL
  17. ERTIFICATE
  18. RD: ORDER
  19. RD: OF CONTINUANCE
  20. TC: HEARING
  21. RD: STIPULATED
  22. TC: NOTICE
  23. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  24. TC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
  25. EPLY
  26. TC: HEARING
  27. ESPONSE
  28. RD: ORDER GRANTING
  29. ESPONSE
  30. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  31. TN: MOTION
  32. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  33. NTRY OF APPEARANCE
  34. EQUEST
  35. RD: STIPULATED
  36. TN: FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  37. TC: HEARING (MOTION)
  38. TC: HEARING (MOTION)
  39. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  40. DG: NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT
  41. DG: JUDGE RECUSAL
  42. UDIO LOG NOTES
  43. DG: NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT
  44. DG: JUDGE RECUSAL
  45. TC: OF NON-AVAILABILITY
  46. TC: HEARING
  47. TC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
  48. EPLY
  49. ESPONSE
  50. TC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
  51. TC: HEARING
  52. TC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
  53. TC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
  54. EPLY
  55. TC: HEARING
  56. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  57. TN: TO COMPEL
  58. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  59. TN: MOTION
  60. TC: NOTICE
  61. ESPONSE
  62. TC: OF INTENT
  63. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  64. ESPONSE
  65. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  66. TC: OF INTENT
  67. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  68. TN: MOTION
  69. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  70. TN: MOTION
  71. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  72. TC: HEARING (MOTION)
  73. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  74. ESPONSE
  75. ERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  76. CM (Differentiated Case Management) SCHEDULING REPORT
  77. CM (Differentiated Case Management) SCHEDULING REPORT
  78. TC: HEARING
  79. EQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
  80. TN: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
  81. NTRY OF APPEARANCE
  82. ERTIFICATE
  83. ISCOVERY
  84. DG: NOTICE OF JUDGE ASSIGNMENT
  85. DG: JUDGE RECUSAL
  86. NSWER
  87. TC: OF NON-AVAILABILITY
  88. TC: OF NON-AVAILABILITY
  89. UMMONS RETURN
  90. FFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  91. FFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  92. FFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  93. CM (Differentiated Case Management) Scheduling Order
  94. ERTIFICATE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more