Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Panola County

Court

Panola County

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2021-12-02
Status Filed
Type Civil Case Other
Docket 33 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Casterline, Mindy Leah
Defendant N/a, N/a
Photo of Hon. Rafferty, Le Ann Kay

Judge

Hon. Rafferty, Le Ann Kay

Panola County (TX)

Texas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION (OCA) PETITIONER MINDY LEAH CASTERLINE VERIFIED PETITION TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS TO INVESTIGATE A POTENTIAL CLAIM OR SUIT
  2. LETTER Letter to District Clerk
  3. Citation BRANDY DUDLEY
  4. Citation DARRIN SHRONTZ
  5. Citation JOSHUA KING
  6. Citation DEVIN TATE
  7. Citation SHEENA TILBURY
  8. Citation STACI MICHELLE SHRONTZ
  9. Citation TAKEN TO PCSO ON THIS DAY DUDLEY, BRANDY Served 12/06/2021 Returned 12/07/2021
  10. Citation TAKEN TO PCSO ON THIS DAY SHRONTZ, DARRIN Served 12/06/2021 Returned 12/07/2021
  11. Citation TAKEN TO PCSO ON THIS DAY KING, JOSHUA Served 12/06/2021 Returned 12/07/2021
  12. Citation TAKEN TO PCSO ON THIS DAY TATE, DEVIN LYNN Served 12/06/2021 Returned 12/07/2021
  13. Citation TAKEN TO PCSO ON THIS DAY TILBURY, SHEENA Served 12/06/2021 Returned 12/07/2021
  14. Citation TAKEN TO PCSO ON THIS DAY SHRONTZ, STACI MICHELLE Served 12/06/2021 Returned 12/07/2021
  15. Citation-Executed
  16. Citation-Executed
  17. Citation-Executed
  18. Citation-Executed
  19. Citation-Executed
  20. Citation-Executed
  21. Response RESPONSE FROM BRANDY DUDLEY & SHEENA TILBURY TO PETITION FOR DEPOSITIONS BEFORE SUIT PURSUANT TO RULE 202
  22. Response RESPONSE FROM STACI MICHELLE SHRONTZ TO PETITION FOR DEPOSITIONS BEFORE SUIT PURSUANT TO RULE 202
  23. Response RESPONSE FROM DARRIN SHRONTZ TO PETITION FOR DEPOSITIONS BEFORE SUIT PURSUANT TO RULE 202
  24. Order Order to Appear
  25. REQUEST REQUEST FOR COPIES, EMAILED TO ATTY GEORGE SHAKE ON THIS DAY
  26. DOCKET ENTRY (Judicial Officer: Rafferty, LeAnn Kay ) Case called. Petitioner present with counsel and sworn. Potential deponents present and sworn. Testimony and arguments considered. Petition granted with respect to all potential deponents except BISD Superintendent. Depositions to be held in Panola County or via zoom and use best efforts to accommodate deponents' schedules. lkr
  27. Deposition Reporter's Certification Deposition of Brandy Dudley
  28. Motion Motion to Compel Discovery and for Sanctions
  29. Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Rafferty, LeAnn Kay)
  30. DOCKET ENTRY Case called. Hearing held via zoom conference. Petitioner present with counsel. Band Booster respondents present ;with counsel. Arguments considered. Motion to compel granted. Respondent to produce documents within thirty days. No attorney fees awarded. lkr
  31. ORDER (RETURNED UNSIGNED BY JUDGE)
  32. Exhibit List HEARING ON MOTION TO COMPEL - EXHIBIT LIST
  33. Motion Petitioner's Second Motion To Compel Discovery And For Sanctions

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more