Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Panola County

Court

Panola County

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-16
Status Disposed
Type Protective Order No Divorce
Docket 45 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Pennamen, Sandra Kay
Defendant Roberson, Cody Glen
Photo of Hon. Rafferty, Le Ann Kay

Judge

Hon. Rafferty, Le Ann Kay

Panola County (TX)

Texas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Application Filed (OCA) Application for Protective Order
  2. REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE CODY ROBERSON
  3. Temporary Orders TEMPORARY EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER
  4. MISCELLANEOUS TCIC IDENTIFIERS
  5. MISCELLANEOUS REDACTED TEMPORARY EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER
  6. MISCELLANEOUS REDACTED REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE- CODY ROBERSON
  7. MISCELLANEOUS REDACTED APPLICATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  8. NOTICE NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  9. PROOF OF RECEIPT PROOF OF RECEIPT OF TEMPORARY EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER- PANOLA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
  10. PROTECTIVE ORDER TEMPORARY EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER- TOOK TO PCSO ON 8/16/2022 ROBERSON, CODY GLEN Returned Unserved 08/18/2022 Returned 08/18/2022
  11. PROOF OF RECEIPT PROOF OF RECEIPT OF TEMPORARY EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER- TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
  12. ISSUANCE-UNEXECUTED CODY ROBERSON
  13. REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE CODY ROBERSON
  14. NOTICE NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER- CODY ROBERSON
  15. Notice NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, PICKED UP BY SANDRA PENNAMEN TO TAKE TO SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS PENNAMEN, SANDRA KAY Unserved
  16. MISCELLANEOUS REDACTED REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE- CODY ROBERSON
  17. Hearing (11:30 AM) (Judicial Officer Rafferty, LeAnn Kay) Protective Order
  18. DOCKET ENTRY (Judicial Officer: Rafferty, LeAnn Kay ) Case called. Applicant and Respondent present and sworn. Testimony given. Respondent agreed to leave marital home and not communicate in a harassing or threatening manner with Applicant. Final protective order denied. lkr
  19. Court Memo - No Document Filed Attempted to return Ms. Pennamen's call twice today. She did not answer either time and her mail box was full so I could not leave a message. ej
  20. Application (Non-OCA) APPLICATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  21. REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE CODY ROBERSON - CALLED PETITIONER FOR SERVICE CLARIFICATION; NO ANSWER - VM NOT AVAILABLE
  22. Temporary Orders TEMPORARY EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER
  23. MISCELLANEOUS REDACTED APPLICATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
  24. MISCELLANEOUS REDACTED REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE - CODY ROBERSON
  25. MISCELLANEOUS REDACTED TEMPORARY EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER
  26. NOTICE NOTICE OF APPLICATION OF PROTECTIVE ORDER
  27. Notice CERT MAIL #9236 0901 9403 8300 3061 90 ROBERSON, CODY GLEN Served 01/09/2023
  28. RECEIPT RECEIPT OF TEMPORARY EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER
  29. ISSUANCE-EXECUTED
  30. Hearing (11:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Rafferty, LeAnn Kay) Protective Order Hearing.
  31. Order Order to Sheriff
  32. DOCKET ENTRY (Judicial Officer: Rafferty, LeAnn Kay ) Case called. Applicant present and sworn. Respondent present and sworn. Testimony given. Applicant's Exhibit 1 admitted into evidence. Case continued until January 26, at 1:30 p.m. Respondent held in contempt of Court and sentenced to thirty days in Panola County Jail for violating the protective order. lkr
  33. Exhibit List HEARING ON PROTECTIVE ORDER WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2023 - EXHIBIT LIST
  34. LETTER LETTER TO JUDGE FROM RESPONDENT
  35. Hearing (1:30 PM) (Judicial Officer Rafferty, LeAnn Kay)
  36. PROTECTIVE ORDER (OCA)
  37. Order FINAL PROTECTIVE ORDER (REDACTED COPY)
  38. NOTICE FINAL PROTECTIVE ORDER
  39. Notice CODY ROBERSON- SERVED IN OPEN COURT BY PCSO ROBERSON, CODY GLEN Served 01/26/2023 Returned 01/27/2023
  40. LETTER CORRESPONDENCE FROM RESPONDENT TO JUDGE RAFFERTY
  41. RECEIPT RECEIPT OF FINAL PROTECTIVE ORDER SENT TO TEXAS DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY VIA FAX ON 01/26/23
  42. RECEIPT RECEIPT OF FINAL PROTECTIVE ORDER DELIVERED TO PCSO ON 01/26/23
  43. RECEIPT RECEIPT OF FINAL PROTECTIVE ORDER DELIVERED TO DOLLAR TREE ON 01/26/23
  44. DOCKET ENTRY (Judicial Officer: Rafferty, LeAnn Kay ) Case called. Applicant present and sworn. Respondent present and sworn. Testimony given. Agreed protective order granted. Order to Sheriff releasing Respondent from jail entered. lkr
  45. Order ORDER TO SHERIFF

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more