Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-08-01
Type Small Claims
Docket 120 entries
Disposition Judgment
Photo of Hon. Thomas Linda S

Judge

Hon. Thomas Linda S

Nowata County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. AFFIDAVT FOR SMALL CLAIMS FILED
  2. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM
  3. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  4. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  5. STATE JUDICIAL REV FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  6. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  7. 10% CASA, COJC, CHS TO REVOLVING FUND
  8. 15% CASA, COJC, CHS TO DISTRICT COURT REV FUND
  9. COURT CLERK FEE 10% OK COUNCIL JUDICIAL COMPLAINS
  10. COURT CLERK FEE 15% OK COUNCIL JUDICIAL COMPLAINS
  11. COURT CLERK FEE 10% OF CO. COMMISSIONER COURTHOUSE SEC
  12. COURT CLERK FEE 15% OF CO. COMMISSIONER COURTHOUSE SEC
  13. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  14. AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
  15. AMENDED AFFIDAVIT AND SUMMONS FILED
  16. RETURN OF SERVICE FILED *ANGELA CARTER*
  17. MAILED TO TULSA COUNTY
  18. CIVIL RETURN
  19. CASE CALLED ON THE DOCKET FOR HEARING ON AFFIDAVIT.
  20. PLT PRESENT AND DEFTS APPEAR. BOTH WERE SWORN. COURT
  21. ADVISES THE PARTIES THAT HE FEELS THAT HE MUST RECUSE
  22. FROM THIS CASE. A RECUSAL WILL BE PREPARED AND SENT TO
  23. JUDGE THOMAS. CASE IS RESET FOR OCTOBER 25, 2022 AT
  24. 1:30 PM FOR STATUS. GIBSON.AF
  25. RECUSAL AND REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT FILED
  26. ORDER OF ASSIGNMENT FILED
  27. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED DWS
  28. CASE CALLED ON DOCKET FOR HEARING. PLANTIFF PRESENT
  29. WITH ATTORNEY TODD CONE. DEFT APPEARS AS WELL. JUDGE
  30. ASKS AND IS ADVISED THAT PARTIES HAVE NOT HAD A CHANCE
  31. TO TALK AND MAYBE COME TO AN AGREEMENT. COURT RECESSED
  32. BUT WITHIN 10 MINUTES ATTORNEY CONE ADVISED THAT NO
  33. AGREEMENT CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED. CONE OPENS WITH
  34. STATEMENT THAT PLANTIFF WAS RENTING BUILDING FROM CARL
  35. GIBSON AND WAS NO LONGER GOING TO RENT SO WAS SELLING
  36. FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT TO DEFT WHO IS THE NEXT
  37. TENNANT. CONTRACTS WERE SHOWN BUT NOT ENTERED AS
  38. EVIDENCE. JUDGE DEEMED CONTRACTS INVALID AS THERE WERE
  39. MISSING PARAGRAPHS AND MAIN ITEM "SALE PRICE" WAS
  40. OMITTED. ALSO WAS EVIDENT DONALD HUTCHISON WAS NOT A
  41. PARTICIPATING PARTY SO WAS DISMISSED FROM CASE. JUDGE
  42. GRANTS ALL EQUIPMENT AND FURNITURE BE RETURNED TO
  43. PLANTIFF AND SET FOR HEARING ON DEC. 13 AT 9:30AM SO
  44. PARTIES HAVE TIME TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT ON WHAT
  45. BELONGS TO THEM AND IF ANY REMAINING ARGUMENT WILL BE
  46. BROUGHT BEFORE THE JUDGE AT THAT TIME. THOMAS/DWS
  47. LIST OF PROPERTY TO WHICH PLAINTIFF MAKES CLAIM FILED
  48. CASE CALLED ON DOCKET FOR HEARING PLANTIFF PRESENT WITH
  49. ATTORNEY TODD CONE AND DEFENDANT ANGELA CARTER PRESENT.
  50. JUDGE SENDING PARTIES TO EARLY SETTLEMENT FOR MEDIATION
  51. AS DEFENDENT WAS NOT PREPARED AS JUDGE HAD ORDERED AT
  52. PREVIOUS HEARING. ATTORNEY CONE WILL GET WITH BOTH
  53. PARTIES AND SCHEDULE A DATE. ORDER BACK SLIPS GIVEN TO
  54. BOTH PARTIES FOR 3/21/23 AT 10AM. THOMAS/DWS
  55. CASE ON THE DOCKET FOR COMPLETION OF HEARING. CASE IS
  56. PASSED TO APRIL 25, 2023 AT 10 AM. PARTIES ARE ADVISED
  57. TO CALL APRIL THE DAY BEFORE TO CONFIRM THE DAY, DATE
  58. AND TIME OF HEARING. ORDER BACK REMINDER NOTES GIVEN.
  59. PLT APPEARS WITH ATTY TODD CONE AND DEFT ANGELA CARTER
  60. PRESENT. AF
  61. CASE IS SET FOR APRIL 25, 2023 AT 11 AM. ATTORNEY TODD
  62. CONE TO MAIL OUT NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES. THOMAS.AF
  63. CASE ON THE DOCKET FOR COMPLETION OF HEARING. PLANTIFF
  64. PRESENT WITH ATTORNEY TODD CONE. DEFENDANT PRESENT HAS
  65. ADVISED SHE JUST HIRED AN ATTORNEY BUT THERE HAS NOT
  66. BEEN AN EOA FILED. DEFENDANT REQUESTS A CONTINUANCE AS
  67. HER ATTORNEY COULD NOT ATTEND. JUDGE DECLINED
  68. CONTINUANCE. ATTORNEY CONE CALLED WITNESS MICHELLE
  69. JOHNSON. WITNESS SWORN AND QUESTIONED. CONE ENTERED
  70. EXHIBIT #1 PHOTOS REFLECTING STUFF IN RESTARAUNT. NO
  71. OBJECTIONS FROM CARTER. CONE ENTERED EXHIBIT #2 LIST OF
  72. EVERYTHING THAT ORIGINALLY BELONGED TO PLANTIFF. CONE
  73. ENTERED EXHIBIT #3 RECEIPTS AND VALUE OF ITEMS. CONE
  74. ENTERED EXHIBIT #4 SIGNED AGREEMENT. CARTER GAVE NO
  75. OBJECTIONS TO ANY OF THE EXHIBITS. CARTER CROSS
  76. EXAMINED PLANTIFF. CARTER NO WITNESSES AS SHE STATED
  77. SHE WAS NOT PREPARED TO PROCEED TODAY. JUDGE THEN
  78. ALLOWED FOR CARTER TO NARRATE STATEMENT IN HER DEFENSE.
  79. PLANTIFF IS ONLY REQUESTING HER EQUIPMENT TO BE
  80. RETURNED AS SHE KNOW DEFT IS ON DISSABILITY AND CAN NOT
  81. AFFORD TO PAY. DEFT AGREES TO RETURN ALL EQUIPMENT
  82. EXCEPT FOR THE FIRE EXTINQUISHER, GREASE EXTINQUISHER,
  83. AC UNIT THAT BELONG TO DEFT AND THE FOOD PREP TABLE SHE
  84. STATES WAS NEVER IN THE BUILDING. JUDGE ORDERS ALL
  85. EQUIPMENT EXCEPT THOSE DEFT LISTED TO BE RETURNED MAY
  86. 4, 2023 WITH PLANTIFF BEING ALLOWED TO TAKE PHOTOS OF
  87. EVERYTHING TODAY APRIL 25, 2023. NEW COURT DATE FOR
  88. CONTROL PURPOSES ONLY MAY 16, 2023 AT 10 AM. ATTORNEY
  89. CONE WILL MAKE CONTACT IF COURT DATE IS ACCTUALLY
  90. NEEDED. THOMAS/DWS
  91. CASE CALLED ON THE DOCKET FOR COMPLETION OF HEARING /
  92. REVIEW OF COMPLIANCE. NO ONE APPEARS. ATTY TODD CONE
  93. HAD ADVISED THAT THE DEFT REFUSED TO ALLOW ACCESS TO
  94. THE PROPERTY BY THE PLT, BY NOT BEING PRESENT ON DATES
  95. PROVIDED BY THE COURT. CASE IS RESET FOR JUNE 20, 2023
  96. AT 10:30 AM. THOMAS.AF
  97. APPLICATION FOR CONTEMPT CITATION AND MOTION FOR
  98. JUDGMENT AND ATTORNEY FEES FILED CI
  99. CITATION FOR CONTEMPT. FILED CI
  100. JUDGMENT. FILED CI
  101. CASE CALLED ON THE DOCKET FOR REVIEW AS TO COMPLIANCE / CONTEMPT. PLT'S ATTY TODD CONE PRESENT WITH PLT, DEFT FAILS TO APPEARS. MR. CONE TO HAVE CITATION SERVED ON THE DEFT AND POSSIBLY HIS APPLICATION FOR ATTYS FEES. COURT ENTERS JUDGMENT ON BEHLAF OF THE PLT OVER AND AGAINST THE DEFT IN THE PRINICIPAL SUM OF $7,000 WITH INTEREST AT THE STATUTORY RATE TOGETHER WITH COSTS AND SERVICE FEES. CASE IS PASSED TO JULY 11, 2023 AT 1:30 PM, THIS CASE WILL BE TAKEN UP FIRST. THOMAS.AF
  102. CASE APPEARS ON THE DOCKE T FOR CONTEMPT CITATION. CASE DOES NOT HAVE SERVICE. CASE IS PASSED TO AUGUST 08 AT 1:30 PM, ALIAS TO BE ISSUED. THOMAS.AF
  103. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  104. NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY FILED
  105. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE RETURNED AS SERVED. FILED CI
  106. CASE CALLED ON THE DOCKET FOR CITATION FOR CONTEMPT. PLT APPEARS WITH ATTY TODD CONE AND DEFT APPEARS WITH ATTY ROBERT SMITH. ARGUMENTS MADE. DEFT P/NG. CASE IS PASSED TO SEPTEMBER 20 AT 3:30 PM. PARTIES ARE LEAVING HERE TO TAKE INVENTORY OF WHAT IS AVAILABLE TO THE PLT. ORDER BACK SLIPS GIVEN. THOMAS.AF
  107. TULSA CO RETURN OF SERVICE RETURNED AS SERVED. FILED CI
  108. PER ATTY CONE: BY AGREEMENT, CASE IS STRICKEN. AF

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase