Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-17
Status CLOSED - CASE CLOSED
Type AF - APPELLATE FELONY
Docket 131 entries

Parties

Plaintiff KRIEGER, JOHN|ROSENZWEIG, JEFFREY MARX
Defendant JOHNSON, DARNISA C EVANS|ATTORNEY GENERAL|STATE OF ARKANSAS|HARRIS, CHRISTIAN SCHOLFIELD
Photo of Hon. Kenneth Hixson Zimmerman Stacey A

Judge

Hon. Kenneth Hixson Zimmerman Stacey A

Arkansas County (AR)

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. APPELLATE COVERSHEET
  2. Appellate court coversheet.
  3. No Images
  5. E-filed record. Pleadings: 2 volumes; 213 pages. Transcript: 1 volume; 702 pages. No physical exhibits.
  6. No Images
  7. LOWER COURT INFORMATION
  9. No Images
  10. BRIEFING COMMENCED
  11. Appellant's brief due March 29, 2022. Briefing notice sent to Jeffrey Rosenzweig and Attorney General.
  13. MOTION TO REMAND
  14. Appellant's motion to remand to settle the record.
  15. MOTION
  18. MOTION
  19. MOTION SUBMITTED
  20. Appellant's motion to remand to settle the record.
  23. Amended motion to remand to settle the record and petition for writ of certiorari to complete the record.
  24. No Images
  25. RECUSAL
  28. FORMAL ORDERS - COA
  29. Appellant's motion to remand to settle the record is moot. Barrett, J., not participating. Appellant's amended motion to remand to settle the record and petition for writ of certiorari to complete the record is granted. Barrett, J., not participating. Writ issued; electronic supplemental record is due in thirty days (April 8, 2022). Appellant's brief is due thirty days after the record is settled and the electronic supplemental record is filed.
  30. ORDER
  32. Writ issued; electronic supplemental record is due in thirty days (April 8, 2022). Appellant's brief is due thirty days after the record is settled and the electronic supplemental record is filed.
  33. WRIT
  34. LETTER TO COURT
  36. No Images
  37. MOT EXT TIME TO SUPP THE REC
  38. Motion for extension of time to comply with writ of certiorari to complete the record.
  40. MOTION SUBMITTED
  41. Motion for extension of time to comply with writ of certiorari to complete the record.
  42. No Images
  45. ORDER
  46. MAIL RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE
  47. Mail returned undeliverable. Will resend this date.
  50. Order remailed April 12, 2022 to HON. Charles Yeargan P O Box 820 Murfresboro, AR 71958-0820 returned again. Marked unable to Forward.
  51. No Images
  52. WRIT RETURNED; SUPP REC FILED
  54. No Images
  55. APPELLANT'S BRIEF
  56. Appellant's Brief e-filed by attorney. Paper copies not required.
  59. Entry of appearance by Christian Harris on behalf of the appellee.
  60. MOTION
  61. MOT TO CERT TO THE SUPR CRT
  63. MOTION
  64. MOTION EXTENSION OF TIME
  65. Appellee's motion for extension of brief time.
  68. Appellee's brief is due June 29, 2022.
  69. ORDER
  70. APPELLEE'S BRIEF
  72. BRIEF
  73. MOTION SUBMITTED
  74. Appellant's motion for certification to the Supreme Court.
  76. REPLY BRIEF
  77. Appellant's Reply Brief e-filed by attorney. Paper copies not required.
  78. BRIEF
  80. Appellant's motion for certification to the Supreme Court is denied.
  81. ORDER
  82. CASE SUBMITTED
  85. MAJORITY OPINION
  86. Affirmed. Gladwin and Klappenbach, JJ., agree.
  87. OPINION
  90. No Images
  91. PETITION TENDERED
  92. Appellant's petition for review tendered pending expiration of time to file petition for rehearing.
  95. Appellant's petition for review.
  96. PETITION
  97. RESPONSE TO PET FOR REVIEW

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more