Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Arkansas Unified County

Court

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-10-27
Status OPEN - CASE OPEN
Type Aa Ancillary Administration
Docket 62 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Newcomb, Jacob Tyler|Joseph, Dena M.
Defendant Joseph, Jonathan J.
Photo of Hon. 14 Th Circuit Division 2

Judge

Hon. 14 Th Circuit Division 2

Arkansas Unified County

Arkansas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. AOC COVERSHEET PROBATE
  2. none.
  3. No Images
  5. none.
  6. COMPLAINT
  7. DEATH CERTIFICATE
  10. MOF ORIGINAL
  11. none.
  12. No Images
  15. No Images
  16. LETTER TO COURT
  17. encl proposed Order Admitting Will
  19. NO ACTION TAKEN
  20. Order attached and letters testamentary are certified not authenticated as required by statute. Please check the county of filing as your letter references Washington and this filing is Newton.
  21. No Images
  23. encl proposed Order
  24. LETTER
  25. NO ACTION TAKEN
  28. FILING - OTHER
  29. Authentication & Certification of Indiana Letters Testamentary
  30. OTHER
  32. re Proposed Order & Authentication of Letters Testamentary
  33. LETTER
  34. ORDER OTHER
  37. ACCEPT APPT PERSONAL REP
  38. none.
  39. WEB
  41. none.
  42. WEB
  43. WAIVER
  46. LETTERS TESTAMENTARY
  47. none.
  48. LETTER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more