Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-11-18
Type Money Judgment/small Claims Under $5000.00
Docket 18 entries
Disposition Judgment
Photo of Hon. HONORABLE ERIC YARBOROUGH

Judge

Hon. HONORABLE ERIC YARBOROUGH

Canadian County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. FILE AFFIDAVIT
  2. LAW LIBRARY
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION
  4. SHERIFF'S FEE
  5. RETURN OF SERVICE
  6. CM/ORDER: CALETTA THRASHER APPEARS IN PERSON, LINDA
  7. DUGAN APPEARS IN PERSON. MS. THRASHER WISHES TO PROCEED
  8. AND MS. DUGAN IS NOT IN AGREEMENT. BOTH PARTIES ARE
  9. READY TO PROCEED TO A HEARING. ALL PARTIES THAT WILL BE
  10. TESTIFYING ARE SWORN IN. MS. THRASHER GIVES TESTIMONY.
  11. MS. THRASHER CALLS JONATHAN GOSS, BYRON DRUMM AND
  12. MARY DRUMM AS WITNESSES. AFTER HEARING TESTIMONY FROM
  13. ALL PARTIES THE COURT GRANTS A JUDGMENT OF $3600 WITH
  14. COURT COSTS OF $108 IN FAVOR OF THE PLAINTIFF. PARTIES
  15. HAVE NOT AGREED ON A PAYMENT PLAN. THERE IS NO RULING
  16. ON THE COUNTERCLAIM MENTIONED IN COURT BY MS. DUGAN
  17. SINCE IT WAS NOT FILED. PARTIES WERE TOLD OF THEIR
  18. RIGHT TO APPEAL. BOTH PARTIES WAIVE THAT RIGHT.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more