Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-06-29
Type Easement
Docket 60 entries
Photo of Hon. MILLS, TIM

Judge

Hon. MILLS, TIM

Muskogee County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. FILE AND ENTER PETITION
  2. OKLA. COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM
  3. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  4. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  5. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  6. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  7. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  9. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  11. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  12. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  13. F AND E ISSUING SUMMONS ISSUED BK TO ATTNY ON DEFT.
  14. RETURN OF SUMMONSON STEPHANIE NELSON BY PSS ALFRED
  15. BULLER
  16. MOTION TO ENTER ORDER APPOINTING COMMISSOIONERS AND
  17. ORDER FOR ENTRY ON LAND
  18. ORDER SETTING HEARING; 09-28-22 @10:00AM S/MILLS
  19. CM 9-28-22, COMES ON FOR: MOTION TO ENTER ORDER
  20. APPOINTING COMMISSIONERS AND ORDER TO ENTER ON LAND.
  21. RULING: MOTION TO ENTER ORDER APPOINTING COMMISSIONERS
  22. IS RESET UPON MOTION. ORDER TO ENTER ON LAND IS
  23. GRANTED. BY AGREEMENT BOTH PARTIES AGREE TO ALLOW JERRY
  24. PERRY OR ANOTHER SURVEYOR BY AGREEMENT TO SURVEY THE
  25. PROPERTY. MATTER IS RESET TO NOVEMBER 2, 2022 AT
  26. 10:00AM. S/MILLS
  27. CM 11-2-22; COMES ON FOR: SURVEYOR STATUS / RULING:
  28. SURVEYOR STATUS IS CONTINUED BY AGREEMENT TO NOV. 30,
  29. 2022 AT 10:00AM /S/MILLS
  30. CM COMES ON FOR: SURVEYOR STATUS. ERIC GRANTHAM APPEARS
  31. ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF.
  32. RULING: MOTION TO APPOINT APPRAISERS IS CONT. TO
  33. 12/7/22 AT 10AM. S/MILLS
  34. CM 12-7-22, COMES ON FOR: SURVEYOR STATUS. ERIC
  35. GRANTHAM APPEARS ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF. STEPHANIE
  36. NELSON APPEARS IN PERSON. RULING: APPOINTMENT OF
  37. APPRAISER'S STATUS DECEMBER 28, 2022 AT 10AM /S/MILLS
  38. CM: PLAINTIFF ATTNY, ERIC GRANTHAM, PRESENT. COMES ON
  39. FOR: SURVEYOR STATUS. RULING: SURVEYOR STATUS RESET TO
  40. 2/22/23 AT 10 AM. DEFT PROVIDES THE PLAINTIFF WITH
  41. MAILING ADDRESS FOR LEGAL CORRESPONDENCE THIS DATE.
  42. S/MILLS.
  43. CM 02/22/23 COMES ON FOR: SURVEYOR STATUS. ERIC
  44. GRANTHAM APPEARS ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF. RULING:
  45. STRICKEN TO BE RESET UPON MOTION. S/MILLS
  46. FIRST AMENDED PETITION
  47. MOTION TO ENTER SCHEDULING ORDER
  48. ORDER SETTING HEARING; SET FOR APRIL 19, 2023 AT 10AM.
  49. /S/MILLS
  50. OBJECTION TO FIRST AMENDED PETITION
  51. SCHEDULING ORDER /S/MILLS
  52. CM 4-19-23, COMES ON FOR: MOTION TO ENTER SCHEDULING
  53. ORDER. ERIC GRANTHAM APPEARS ON BEHALF OF THE
  54. PLAINTIFF. DEFENDANT APPEARS IN PERSON. RULING: AGREED
  55. SCHEDULING ORDER APPROVED THIS DATE. /S/MILLS
  56. MOTION TO APPOINT COMMISSIONERS AND/OR SET TRIAL ON
  57. NECESSITY OF TAKING
  58. ORDER SETTING HEARING. SET FOR 8/16/23 AT 10 O'CLOCK.
  59. S/MILLS

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more