Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Lorain Co

Court

Lorain Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-11-14
Type Annulment
Docket 10 entries
Disposition without prejudice

Parties

Plaintiff Miller, Faith
Defendant Anselm, Frederick
Photo of Hon. Janik, Judge Frank

Judge

Hon. Janik, Judge Frank

Lorain County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Filing fee of $280.00, paid by: FAITH MILLER
  2. Receipt #: 22-0026221 Processed.
  3. COMPLAINT FOR ANNULMENT, CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE NOTICE FILED
  4. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE FILED BY FAITH MILLER
  5. SUMMONS/ COMPLAINT/ NOTICE SENT CERTIFIED MAIL TO: FREDERICK ANSELM ARTICLE #9414726699042202732197
  6. SIGNED RECEIPT RETURNED AND FILED FOR CERTIFIED MAIL #9414726699042202732197 - SIGNATURE - NO DATE
  7. MATTER CAME BEFORE THE COURT FOR AN INITIAL PRE-TRIAL. BASED ON PARTIES AGREED REPRESENTATION OF THE FACTS, AN ANNULMENT IS NOT VALID. COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE COURT HEREBY WAIVES THE FILING FEE FOR A COMPLAINT FOR DIVORCE. DEFT'S MOTHER, MARISA RODGERS, SHOULD BE FORMALLY APPOINTED AS HER SON'S GUARDIAN BY THE NEXT PRE-TRIAL DATE. COURT COSTS ARE ASSESSED TO PLTF. SEE JOURNAL. (FJJ) CC: PLTF, DEFT (C/O MARISA RODGERS)
  8. CIVIL RULE 58 (B) NOTICE SENT ORDINARY MAIL TO PLTF, DEFT (C/O MARISA RODGERS)
  9. Receipt #: 23-0000983 Processed.
  10. CASE TAXED AND CLOSED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more