Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Warren County

Court

Warren County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-01-20
Status CLOSED
Type Professional Tort
Docket 43 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Rossi, Arthur
Defendant Atrium Medical Center
Photo of Hon. Tepe, Timothy N.

Judge

Hon. Tepe, Timothy N.

Warren County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED 01/20/2022 CASE NUMBER 22CV094845
  2. STATEMENT OF COSTS
  3. NOTICE OF APPEAL SUPREME COURT
  4. OPINION (JOURNAL BOOK 1329 PAGE 935)
  5. JUDGMENT ENTRY (JOURNAL BOOK 1329 PAGE 934)
  6. FILE SENT COURT OF APPEALS
  7. NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED (COURT OF APPEALS) 2022-05-027
  8. FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTICE MAILED TO ATTYS OR PARTIES
  9. DECISION GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (JOURNAL BOOK 1280 PAGE 941)
  10. NOTICE OF HEARING SENT
  11. SUBMISSION SET FOR 04/21/2022 AT 8:30 AM IN 4/ , HEARD BY: TEPE, TIMOTHY N.
  12. MOTION OF DEFENDANT ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (ATTY SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO JUDGE'S OFFICE AND NOT THE CLERK OF COURTS OFFICE)
  13. FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER NOTICE MAILED TO ATTYS OR PARTIES
  14. DECISION GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (JOURNAL BOOK 1277 PAGE 865) (NOT DISPOSITIVE OF CASE)
  15. ENTRY DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE (JOURNAL BOOK 1277 PAGE 864)
  16. DEFENDANT ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
  17. RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STRIKE
  18. MOTION TO STRIKE OF DEFENDANTS, MID-VALLEY GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOCIATES, DR. DARYL HACKER AND DR. KULDIP SHARMA
  19. MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS
  20. NOTICE OF HEARING SENT
  21. SUBMISSION SET FOR 03/25/2022 AT 8:30 AM IN 4/ , HEARD BY: TEPE, TIMOTHY N.
  22. MOTION
  23. SUMMONS SUCCESSFUL SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED 1/21/22 TO: ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER DALE E CREECH JR, STATUTORY AGENT: CM ON ? BY ?
  24. SUMMONS SUCCESSFUL SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED 1/21/22 TO: ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER: CM ON ? BY BETTY ?
  25. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
  26. ENTRY TO EXTEND PERIOD OF TIME TO FILE AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT
  27. FILE FOLDER LABEL
  28. LABELS ONLY - CM
  29. SUMMONS ISSUED. REASON:
  30. SUMMONS SENT TO BE SERVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED TO: SHARMA, KULVIP MD
  31. SUMMONS ISSUED. REASON:
  32. SUMMONS SENT TO BE SERVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED TO: HACKER, DARYL MD
  33. SUMMONS ISSUED. REASON:
  34. SUMMONS SENT TO BE SERVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED TO: MID-VALLEY GASTRO ENTROLOGY
  35. SUMMONS ISSUED. REASON:
  36. SUMMONS SENT TO BE SERVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED TO: ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER
  37. SUMMONS ISSUED. REASON:
  38. SUMMONS SENT TO BE SERVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED TO: ATRIUM MEDICAL CENTER
  39. MOTION TO EXTEND PERIOD OF TIME TO FILE AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT WITH PROPOSED ENTRY ATTACHED
  40. AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT BY DR SHELDON L BROWNSTEIN MD, FACP, FACC, FHRS
  41. COMPLAINT FOR MALPRACTICE WITH AFFIDAVIT OF MERIT ATTACHED
  42. ATTORNEY: MCINTOSH, MICHAEL TODD ASSIGNED
  43. JUDGE TEPE, TIMOTHY N.: ASSIGNED

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more