Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- NTC: OF NON-AVAILABILITY
- Notice of Non-Availability for Raul Carrillo Jr. - Attorney for Defendant -
- ORD: STIPULATED
- STIPULATED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
- REQUEST FOR HEARING/ SETTING
- Request for Setting - Motion to Dismiss
- NTC: COMPLETION OF BRIEFING
- Notice of Completion of Briefing - Defendant Weiss-McNair's Motion to Dismiss
- REPLY
- Defendant Weiss-McNair's Reply to Motion to Dismiss for Inappropriate Venue
- ORD: EXTENDING TIME
- ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
- MTN: MOTION/ PETITION TO EXTEND TIME
- Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
- ORD: ORDER
- Order on Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
- RESPONSE
- Plaintiff's Sun Valley Inc's Response to Defendant Weiss-McNair LLC's Motion to Dismiss
- MTN: MOTION
- Plaintiff Sun Valley, Inc's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
- MTN: MOTION
- Motion to Dismiss for Inappropriate Venue
- ORD: ORDER
- Order on Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
- MTN: MOTION/ PETITION TO EXTEND TIME
- Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time
- ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
- Entry of Appearance - Raul A. Carrillo, Jr. for Defendant Weiss-McNair, LLC
- JURY DEMAND 12 PERSON
- CHRISTOPHER HARSE S JURY DEMAND FOR TWELVE PERSONS: *PAID $300.00*
- ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
- ENTRY OF APPEARANCE: FOR DEFENDANT CHRISTOPHER HARSE
- ANSWER
- CHRISTOPHER HARSE S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FOR FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT, FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION, NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION, BREACH OF CONTRACT, BREACH OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING, AND TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE
- SUMMONS RETURN
- Summons Return: Defendant served on May 20, 2022 by Other Person and Mail
- DCM (Differentiated Case Management) Scheduling Order
- Order Requiring Scheduling Reports, a Discovery Plan, Expert Witness Disclosure, and Limiting Stipulations to Enlarge Time for Responsive Pleadings
- OPN: COMPLAINT
- Original Complaint for Damages for Fraudulent Inducement, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Negligent Misrepresentation, Breach of Contract, Breach of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, and Tortious Interference.
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In