Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Escambia County

Court

Escambia County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-02-14
Status OPEN
Type Declaratory Judgment
Docket 40 entries
Disposition Judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Phoenix Coatings Inc
Defendant Pro Construction Llc | Pro Construction Llc | First Onsite Restoration Inc
Photo of Hon. / FRYDRYCHOWICZ , JENNIFER J

Judge

Hon. / FRYDRYCHOWICZ , JENNIFER J

Escambia County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DEFENDANTS’ SECOND AMENDED/SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  2. EFENDANTS FIRST ONSITE RESTORATION, INC'S SECOND AMENDED/SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  3. DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF SERVING VERIFIED AMENDED ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST INTERROGATORIES
  4. DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF SERVING UNVERIFIED AMENDED ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST INTERROGATORIES
  5. DEFENDANT FIRST ONSITE RESTORATION, INC.’S AMENDED RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  6. DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  7. RDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL AND IMPOSE SANCTIONS
  8. EFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO MOTION TO COMPEL
  9. EFENDANT'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES
  10. EFENDANT PRO CONSTRUCTION LLC'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  11. DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  12. DEFENDANT FIRST ONSITE RESTORATION, INC.’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  13. LAINTIFF'S AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
  14. PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL AND TO IMPOSE SANCTIONS
  15. LAINTIFFS NOTICE OF HEARING
  16. PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL AND TO IMPOSE SANCTIONS
  17. OTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION DUCES TECUM OF CORPORATE REPRESENTATIVE OF PRO CONSTRUCTION, LLC
  18. LAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL AND TO IMPOSE SANCTIONS
  19. EDIATION REPORT
  20. OTICE OF MEDIATION ATTENDANCE AND CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORITY
  21. NOTICE OF MEDIATION
  22. INTERSTATE RESTORATION, LLC D/B/A FIRST ONSITE PROPERTY RESTORATION’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE
  23. NOTICE FOR TRIAL
  24. PHOENIX COATINGS, INC.’S ANSWER TO PRO CONSTRUCTION, LLC’S COUNTERCLAIM
  25. INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER-GENERAL
  26. PAYMENT $395.00 RECEIPT #2022024673
  27. DEFENDANT'S ATTORNEY: WHITTAKER, CLAY H ASSIGNED
  28. PRO CONSTRUCTION LLC'S ANSWER AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND COUNTERLCLAIM
  29. SUMMONS RETURNED SERVED
  30. SUMMONS RETURNED SERVED
  31. PAYMENT $420.00 RECEIPT #2022013294
  32. [email protected], [email protected]
  33. ORDER REGARDING REQUIRED REPORTING
  34. SUMMONS ISSUED
  35. SUMMONS ISSUED
  36. PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY: FLEMING, EDWARD P ASSIGNED
  37. WILLIAMS, THOMAS H: ASSIGNED
  38. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
  39. CIVIL COVER SHEET
  40. CIVIL COVER SHEET

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more